Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TLTW vs TSYW: which paid, and which earned it?

TLTW and TSYW both write options for income.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF and Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF.

9.6%TLTW cash paid, 1 year
9.6%TSYW cash paid, 1 year
−0.5%TLTW total return, 1 year
−9.8%TSYW total return, 1 year
TLTW4.2 pts ahead of TLT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−4.7%TLTW−0.5%4.2 pts ahead of TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−4.7%TLTW−0.5%4.2 pts ahead of TLT
TSYW4.2 pts behind TLT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−5.6%TSYW−9.8%4.2 pts behind TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−5.6%TSYW−9.8%4.2 pts behind TLT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TLTW and TSYW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in TLTWOnly in TSYW
TREASURY BOND 4.56%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
TREASURY BOND 4.33%
TREASURY BOND 4.23%
TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.18%
TREASURY BOND 4.09%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.03%
TREASURY BOND 3.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

TLTW and TSYW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
TLTWTSYWTLTWTSYWTLTWTSYW
3 months−4.3%−7.1%1.9%2.8%+0.9 pts−1.9 pts
6 months−1.6%−5.7%4.3%6.1%+1.5 pts−2.5 pts
1 year−0.5%not published9.6%not published+4.2 ptsnot published
3 years+5.2%not published33.6%not published+5.8 ptsnot published
Since launch−4.0%−9.8%41.3%9.6%+11.4 pts−4.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TLTW and TSYW on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
Covered call on TLT, paying monthly
TSYW
Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on TLT, paying weekly
IssueriSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered calloption income
Benchmark20+ Year Treasury (TLT)20+ Year Treasury (TLT)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized7.5%12.4%
Expense ratio0.35%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year9.6%9.6% (since launch on Nov 13, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−9.9%−18.8%
Total return, 1 year−0.5%−9.8% (since launch on Nov 13, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year−4.7%−5.6%
Ahead or behind+4.2 pts−4.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1488 days309 days
Net assets$1.8bn$3m

TLTW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TLTW paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.5%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.5%, paid monthly.

TSYW in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 13, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, TSYW paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −9.8%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −5.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, TLTW or TSYW?
TLTW charges 0.35% a year and TSYW charges 0.99%, so TLTW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TLTW against TSYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TLTW against TSYW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tltw-vs-tsyw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources