Data as of .
TCAL vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XRMI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against TCAL’s 11.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XRMI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TCAL and XRMI hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | TCAL | XRMI |
|---|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM INC | 1.53% | 3.82% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 1.50% | 5.63% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 1.04% | 1.40% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES | 1.69% | 0.96% |
| BROADCOM INC | 0.95% | 2.61% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.86% | 1.00% |
| WALMART INC | 0.77% | 0.72% |
| MASTERCARD INC - A | 1.50% | 0.69% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.14% | 0.66% |
| J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. | 0.66% | 1.44% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 1.20% | 0.61% |
| COCA-COLA CO/THE | 0.90% | 0.52% |
| Only in TCAL | Only in XRMI |
|---|---|
| WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80% | NVIDIA CORP 8.27% |
| SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL 1.43% | APPLE INC 7.54% |
| GE HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.31% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15% |
| US FOODS HOLDING CORP 1.20% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.16% | META PLATFORMS INC 2.26% |
| MARSH & MCLENNAN COS 1.16% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.76% |
| INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE INC 1.01% | TESLA INC 1.58% |
| META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A 1.01% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCAL | XRMI | TCAL | XRMI | TCAL | XRMI | |
| 3 months | +4.2% | +3.5% | 3.5% | 3.0% | +1.9 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +5.3% | +8.9% | 6.3% | 6.3% | −12.7 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 1 year | +3.0% | +10.3% | 11.4% | 12.1% | −13.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +27.2% | not published | 33.3% | not published | −51.2 pts |
| Since launch | +3.9% | +17.0% | 15.2% | 43.8% | −32.7 pts | −66.1 pts |
| TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | T. Rowe Price | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.4% | 12.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.4% | 12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.6% | −2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.0% | +10.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −13.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 95% |
| Age | 540 days | 1849 days |
| Net assets | $276m | $60m |
TCAL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.
XRMI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, TCAL or XRMI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so XRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, TCAL or XRMI?
- With every distribution reinvested, TCAL returned +3.0% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XRMI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, TCAL or XRMI?
- TCAL charges 0.34% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TCAL against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tcal-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.