Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TCAL vs XPAY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XPAY paid 19.9% of its price in cash against TCAL’s 11.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF.

11.4%TCAL cash paid, 1 year
19.9%XPAY cash paid, 1 year
+3.0%TCAL total return, 1 year
+15.7%XPAY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XPAY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

TCAL 21.9XPAY 50.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TCAL13.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%TCAL+3.0%11.4% as cash13.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%TCAL+3.0%13.5 pts behind SPY
XPAY0.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XPAY+15.7%19.9% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XPAY+15.7%19.9% as cash0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TCAL and XPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in TCALOnly in XPAY
DANAHER CORP 2.01%SPY 02/12/2027 33.47 C 13.75%
WATERS CORP 1.97%SPY 07/16/2027 36.7 C 11.79%
VERALTO CORP 1.87%SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 11.51%
WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80%SPY 04/16/2027 33.87 C 11.49%
YUM BRANDS INC 1.72%SPY 06/11/2027 37.11 C 10.07%
MCDONALD S CORP 1.70%SPY 01/15/2027 33.21 C 6.96%
VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.69%SPY 12/11/2026 33.1 C 6.40%
LINDE PLC 1.63%SPY 09/10/2027 37.99 C 5.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

TCAL and XPAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
TCALXPAYTCALXPAYTCALXPAY
3 months+4.2%+2.0%3.5%5.0%+1.9 pts−0.3 pts
6 months+5.3%+17.8%6.3%11.1%−12.7 pts−0.2 pts
1 year+3.0%+15.7%11.4%19.9%−13.5 pts−0.9 pts
Since launch+3.9%+34.7%15.2%37.5%−32.7 pts−2.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TCAL and XPAY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TCAL
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerT. Rowe PriceRoundhill
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized9.4%20.8%
Expense ratio0.34%0.49%
Cash paid, 1 year11.4%19.9%
Price change, 1 year−8.6%−5.8%
Total return, 1 year+3.0%+15.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−13.5 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age540 days687 days
Net assets$276m$179m

TCAL in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.

XPAY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XPAY paid 19.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, TCAL or XPAY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting price in cash and XPAY paid 19.9%, so XPAY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, TCAL or XPAY?
With every distribution reinvested, TCAL returned +3.0% and XPAY returned +15.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XPAY returned more.
Which is cheaper, TCAL or XPAY?
TCAL charges 0.34% a year and XPAY charges 0.49%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TCAL against XPAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TCAL against XPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tcal-vs-xpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources