Data as of .
SPUT vs TPRY: which paid, and which earned it?
SPUT and TPRY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPUT and TPRY hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPUT | TPRY |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 3.85% | 4.39% |
| Apple Inc | 3.22% | 4.91% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 2.09% | 12.40% |
| Alphabet Inc | 1.84% | 6.91% |
| Broadcom Inc | 1.60% | 1.49% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.10% | 5.35% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 0.48% | 13.23% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.47% | 3.70% |
| Lam Research Corp | 0.27% | 4.08% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 0.16% | 1.38% |
| Boeing Co/The | 0.14% | 4.30% |
| Uber Technologies Inc | 0.12% | 5.23% |
| Only in SPUT | Only in TPRY |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 49.24% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 8.48% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.47% | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 4.46% |
| Alphabet Inc 1.59% | Baidu Inc 3.72% |
| Tesla Inc 0.91% | American Airlines Group Inc 3.42% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.70% | ASML Holding NV 2.63% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 0.65% | MU US 10/16/26 C1090 0.47% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 0.54% | META US 10/16/26 P655 0.16% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.54% | AMZN US 10/16/26 P240 0.14% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUT | TPRY | SPUT | TPRY | SPUT | TPRY | |
| 3 months | +2.4% | −5.9% | 1.1% | 3.5% | +0.1 pts | −8.2 pts |
| 6 months | +11.5% | +11.9% | 2.5% | 8.1% | −6.5 pts | −6.1 pts |
| 1 year | +11.5% | not published | 5.2% | not published | −5.1 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +22.4% | +2.1% | 8.5% | 7.4% | −15.6 pts | −9.3 pts |
| SPUT Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.7% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.95% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.2% | 7.4% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +6.0% | −5.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.5% | +2.1% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +11.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.1 pts | −9.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 553 days | 204 days |
| Net assets | $17m | $4m |
SPUT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPUT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly.
TPRY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 26, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPRY paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +11.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, SPUT or TPRY?
- SPUT charges 0.79% a year and TPRY charges 0.95%, so SPUT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPUT against TPRY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sput-vs-tpry Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.