Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SIOO vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

SIOO and XDTE both write options for income.

VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

11.1%SIOO cash paid, 1 year
26.5%XDTE cash paid, 1 year
+10.8%SIOO total return, 1 year
+15.6%XDTE total return, 1 year
SIOOAbout even with OEF · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
OEF+11.0%SIOO+10.8%11.1% of it arrived as cashabout even with OEFTotal return, distributions reinvestedOEF+11.0%SIOO+10.8%11.1% cashabout even with OEF
XDTE1 pt behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XDTE+15.6%26.5% of it arrived as cash1 pt behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XDTE+15.6%26.5% as cash1 pt behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SIOO and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in SIOOOnly in XDTE
NVIDIA Corp 9.83%SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 66.30%
Apple Inc 9.24%SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 24.62%
United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 7.85%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.23%
Microsoft Corp 5.91%First American Government Obligations Fu 1.84%
Amazon.com Inc 4.41%
Alphabet Inc 3.62%
Broadcom Inc 3.57%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

SIOO and XDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
SIOOXDTESIOOXDTESIOOXDTE
3 months+4.0%+2.5%3.7%5.1%+0.7 pts+0.3 pts
6 months+14.3%+14.9%7.9%10.6%−5.8 pts−3.1 pts
1 yearnot published+15.6%not published26.5%not published−1.0 pts
Since launch+10.8%+45.9%11.1%59.5%−0.2 pts−6.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SIOO and XDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SIOO
VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF
Covered call on OEF, paying monthly
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerVistaSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 100 (OEF)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized15.1%15.2%
Expense rationot published0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year11.1% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025)26.5%
Price change, 1 year−1.1%−13.4%
Total return, 1 year+10.8% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025)+15.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.0%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−0.2 pts−1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age281 days925 days
Net assets$21m$336m

SIOO in plain words

Over the period since launch on Dec 11, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, SIOO paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. S&P 100 (OEF) returned +11.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

XDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XDTE paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.2%, paid weekly.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SIOO against XDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIOO against XDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sioo-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources