Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SDVD vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XRMI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against SDVD’s 9.2% and the two finished level on total return.

FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF.

9.2%SDVD cash paid, 1 year
12.1%XRMI cash paid, 1 year
+10.8%SDVD total return, 1 year
+10.3%XRMI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XRMI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

SDVD 37.8XRMI 43.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

SDVD16.4 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%9.2% of it arrived as cash16.4 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%16.4 pts behind SCHD
XRMI6.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XRMI+10.3%12.1% of it arrived as cash6.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XRMI+10.3%6.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDVD and XRMI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDVD and XRMI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDVDXRMI
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company0.26%0.13%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.0.60%0.09%
Fifth Third Bancorp0.48%0.07%
NetApp, Inc.0.84%0.07%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (Class A0.99%0.06%
Xylem Inc.0.43%0.05%
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.0.61%0.04%
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.0.45%0.04%
EMCOR Group, Inc.0.90%0.04%
Expedia Group, Inc.0.97%0.04%
HP Inc.0.53%0.04%
M&T Bank Corporation0.92%0.04%
Only in each
Only in SDVDOnly in XRMI
National HealthCare Corporation 1.12%NVIDIA CORP 8.27%
First BanCorp. 1.04%APPLE INC 7.54%
OFG Bancorp 1.03%MICROSOFT CORP 5.63%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01%AMAZON.COM INC 3.82%
Interparfums, Inc. 1.00%ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15%
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00%BROADCOM INC 2.61%
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. 0.95%ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50%
PriceSmart, Inc. 0.95%META PLATFORMS INC 2.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

SDVD and XRMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
SDVDXRMISDVDXRMISDVDXRMI
3 months−0.1%+3.5%2.1%3.0%−6.7 pts+1.2 pts
6 months+8.3%+8.9%4.4%6.3%−4.3 pts−9.1 pts
1 year+10.8%+10.3%9.2%12.1%−16.4 pts−6.3 pts
3 years+53.0%+27.2%30.7%33.3%−0.7 pts−51.2 pts
Since launch+47.6%+17.0%29.7%43.8%−4.1 pts−66.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SDVD and XRMI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDVD
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustGlobal X
Strategydividend stocks with call overlayoption income
BenchmarkUS dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.8%12.3%
Expense ratio0.85%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year9.2%12.1%
Price change, 1 year+1.2%−2.4%
Total return, 1 year+10.8%+10.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+27.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−16.4 pts−6.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published95%
Age1135 days1849 days
Net assets$888m$60m

SDVD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

XRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, SDVD or XRMI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so XRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, SDVD or XRMI?
With every distribution reinvested, SDVD returned +10.8% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SDVD returned more.
Which is cheaper, SDVD or XRMI?
SDVD charges 0.85% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so XRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDVD against XRMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDVD against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sdvd-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources