Data as of .
SDTY vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XDTE paid 26.9% of its price in cash against SDTY’s 24.7% and the two finished level on total return.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SDTY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SDTY and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SDTY | Only in XDTE |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 92.47% | SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 67.54% |
| TREASURY BILL 3.84% | SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 25.09% |
| TREASURY BILL 3.68% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDTY | XDTE | SDTY | XDTE | SDTY | XDTE | |
| 3 months | +4.6% | +3.9% | 6.1% | 5.1% | +1.3 pts | +0.6 pts |
| 6 months | +14.8% | +13.4% | 13.8% | 10.5% | −1.2 pts | −2.6 pts |
| 1 year | +16.9% | +16.6% | 24.7% | 26.9% | −0.6 pts | −0.9 pts |
| Since launch | +21.9% | +45.7% | 35.1% | 59.3% | −6.3 pts | −7.2 pts |
| SDTY YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly | XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Roundhill |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 21.0% | 17.6% |
| Expense ratio | 1.08% | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 24.7% | 26.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −9.9% | −12.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.9% | +16.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.6 pts | −0.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 63% | not published |
| Age | 582 days | 918 days |
SDTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, SDTY paid 24.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 63% of the distribution paid Sep 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XDTE paid 26.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.6%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, SDTY or XDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, SDTY paid 24.7% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 26.9%, so XDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, SDTY or XDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, SDTY returned +16.9% and XDTE returned +16.6% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so SDTY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, SDTY or XDTE?
- SDTY charges 1.08% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so XDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDTY against XDTE, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sdty-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.