Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SCLZ vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

SCLZ and XQQI both write options for income.

Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

8.4%SCLZ cash paid, 1 year
13.7%XQQI cash paid, 1 year
+13.2%SCLZ total return, 1 year
+14.3%XQQI total return, 1 year
SCLZ14 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%SCLZ+13.2%8.4% of it arrived as cash14 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%SCLZ+13.2%14 pts behind SCHD
XQQI2.9 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% of it arrived as cash2.9 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%2.9 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCLZ and XQQI hold 50% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCLZ and XQQI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCLZXQQI
APPLE INC6.15%7.25%
NVIDIA CORP5.99%8.26%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC7.89%5.94%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC5.14%4.36%
AMAZON.COM INC3.75%4.37%
MICROSOFT CORP3.71%4.72%
ALPHABET INC5.18%3.50%
BROADCOM INC4.71%2.99%
META PLATFORMS INC3.34%2.78%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC3.01%2.14%
TESLA INC1.80%3.55%
WALMART INC1.48%2.58%
Only in each
Only in SCLZOnly in XQQI
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86%Intel Corp 3.27%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.50%Alphabet Inc 3.24%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.10%Applied Materials Inc 2.54%
GE AEROSPACE 2.74%Lam Research Corp 2.49%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.41%KLA Corp 1.49%
VISA INC 2.27%Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.20%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.92%Marvell Technology Inc 1.18%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.84%Texas Instruments Inc 1.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

SCLZ and XQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
SCLZXQQISCLZXQQISCLZXQQI
3 months+2.9%−2.7%2.1%4.8%−3.6 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+14.2%+21.8%3.8%11.4%+1.6 pts−2.4 pts
1 year+13.2%not published8.4%not published−14.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+36.5%+14.3%19.6%13.7%−6.3 pts−2.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SCLZ and XQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
XQQI
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerSwanNEOS
Strategydividend stocks with call overlayoption income
BenchmarkUS dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.5%20.5%
Expense ratio0.79%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year8.4%13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+4.1%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+13.2%+14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+27.2%+17.3%
Ahead or behind−14.0 pts−2.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age934 days227 days
Net assets$20m$351m

SCLZ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.

XQQI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, SCLZ or XQQI?
SCLZ charges 0.79% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCLZ against XQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCLZ against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources