Data as of .
SCLZ vs TPRY: which paid, and which earned it?
SCLZ and TPRY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCLZ and TPRY hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCLZ | TPRY |
|---|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 7.89% | 13.23% |
| ALPHABET INC | 5.18% | 6.91% |
| APPLE INC | 6.15% | 4.91% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 5.99% | 4.39% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.75% | 12.40% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 5.14% | 3.70% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.34% | 5.35% |
| BROADCOM INC | 4.71% | 1.49% |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.11% | 5.23% |
| Only in SCLZ | Only in TPRY |
|---|---|
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 8.48% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.71% | Vistra Corp 4.57% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.50% | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 4.46% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.10% | Boeing Co/The 4.30% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.01% | NRG Energy Inc 4.18% |
| GE AEROSPACE 2.74% | Lam Research Corp 4.08% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.41% | Baidu Inc 3.72% |
| VISA INC 2.27% | American Airlines Group Inc 3.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | TPRY | SCLZ | TPRY | SCLZ | TPRY | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | −5.9% | 2.1% | 3.5% | −3.6 pts | −8.2 pts |
| 6 months | +14.2% | +11.9% | 3.8% | 8.1% | +1.6 pts | −6.1 pts |
| 1 year | +13.2% | not published | 8.4% | not published | −14.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +36.5% | +2.1% | 19.6% | 7.4% | −6.3 pts | −9.3 pts |
| SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Swan | VistaShares |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.5% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.95% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.4% | 7.4% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.1% | −5.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.2% | +2.1% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +11.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.0 pts | −9.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 934 days | 204 days |
| Net assets | $20m | $4m |
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
TPRY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 26, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPRY paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +11.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, SCLZ or TPRY?
- SCLZ charges 0.79% a year and TPRY charges 0.95%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCLZ against TPRY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-tpry Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.