Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
SCEP vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
SCEP and XYLG both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCEP and XYLG
Net assets: $235m on Jun 30, 2026 for STERLING CAPITAL HEDGED EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF, and $72m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
Not measured
SCEP since launch: paid 6.1%, price −1.0%, total +5.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SCEP
+5.3%
6.1% of it arrived as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
SCEP since launch: paid 6.1%, price −1.0%, total +5.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SCEP
+5.3%
6.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. SCEP since launch: paid 6.1%, price −1.0%, total +5.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.0.8 pts ahead of SPY
XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
XYLG
+15.6%
12.7% of it arrived as cash
0.8 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.8 pts ahead of SPY
XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
XYLG
+15.6%
12.7% as cash
0.8 pts ahead of SPY
12.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
XYLG costs 0.30 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SCEP | XYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +15.6% |
| Price change | fell 1.1% (6 months) | rose 1.5% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 5, 2026 payment | 80% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | its own stocks | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, SCEP as of Jun 30, 2026 and XYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 | $235m | $72m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 40% | |
Risk and return
Dec 19, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 45 weekly returnsFrom Dec 2025 to Oct 2026, XYLG returned more: +11.3% to +4.7%. XYLG fell slightly less at its worst: −6.3% to −6.6%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | SCEP | XYLG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +4.7% | +11.3% | XYLG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −1.0% | −1.5% | SCEP | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −6.6% | −6.3% | XYLG (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 45 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCEP and XYLG hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
40% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SCEP | XYLG | SCEP | XYLG | SCEP | XYLG |
| 3 months | −1.2% | +1.4% | 1.7% | 1.1% | +0.8 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | +2.4% | +6.7% | 3.5% | 2.5% | +0.4 pts | +1.7 pts |
| 1 year | – | +15.6% | – | 12.7% | – | +0.8 pts |
| 3 years | – | +65.6% | – | 44.3% | – | −17.4 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: SCEP Dec 2025 · XYLG Sep 2020 | +5.3% | +116.0% | 6.1% | 69.8% | not measured | −38.4 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for SCEP.
SCEP's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026) returned +2.1% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Over the 6 months to Nov 4, 2026, SCEP paid 3.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly. Sterling Capital estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XYLG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XYLG paid 12.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCEP against XYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/scep-vs-xylg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). SCEP against XYLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/scep-vs-xylg
[SCEP against XYLG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/scep-vs-xylg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.