Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

RNTY vs XSHP: which paid, and which earned it?

RNTY and XSHP both write options for income.

YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF and Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF.

11.9%RNTY cash paid, 1 year
7.3%XSHP cash paid, 1 year
+4.6%RNTY total return, 1 year
−13.1%XSHP total return, 1 year
RNTY12 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%11.9% cash12 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%12 pts behind SPY
XSHP16.4 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPY

Performance, window by window

RNTY and XSHP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
RNTYXSHPRNTYXSHPRNTYXSHP
3 months−2.3%−11.0%3.0%7.4%−4.5 pts−13.3 pts
6 months+2.5%not published6.2%not published−15.6 ptsnot published
1 year+4.6%not published11.9%not published−12.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+7.9%−13.1%15.8%7.3%−39.2 pts−16.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
RNTY and XSHP on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RNTY
YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly
XSHP
Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxKurv
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.5%33.5%
Expense ratio0.99%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year11.9%7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−7.3%−21.8%
Total return, 1 year+4.6%−13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+3.3%
Ahead or behind−12.0 pts−16.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%94%
Age519 days93 days
Net assets$6m$7m

RNTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RNTY paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.5%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XSHP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, RNTY or XSHP?
RNTY charges 0.99% a year and XSHP charges 0.99%, so RNTY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RNTY against XSHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RNTY against XSHP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rnty-vs-xshp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources