Data as of .
QYLG vs XIDE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against XIDE’s 6.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and XIDE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QYLG | Only in XIDE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 8.44% | 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07 110.36% |
| APPLE INC 7.73% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/2026 1.02% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.77% | 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 680.58 0.73% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.51% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.31% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.51% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97% | US Dollar 0.49% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.23% | 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 612.52 -0.33% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.11% | 2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 680.58 -13.29% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLG | XIDE | QYLG | XIDE | QYLG | XIDE | |
| 3 months | −0.1% | +1.6% | 2.1% | 1.5% | +2.4 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +19.6% | +6.0% | 4.6% | 3.2% | −4.7 pts | −12.0 pts |
| 1 year | +22.2% | +6.5% | 17.4% | 6.3% | +0.5 pts | −10.1 pts |
| 3 years | +76.2% | not published | 51.1% | not published | −22.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +122.0% | +19.9% | 75.3% | 17.4% | −52.0 pts | −46.8 pts |
| QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | XIDE FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.8% | 6.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 17.4% | 6.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | +2.4% | 0.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +6.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.5 pts | −10.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 96% | not published |
| Age | 2187 days | 1005 days |
| Net assets | $175m | $23m |
QYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XIDE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIDE paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QYLG or XIDE?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and XIDE paid 6.3%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or XIDE?
- With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and XIDE returned +6.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QYLG or XIDE?
- QYLG charges 0.35% a year and XIDE charges 0.85%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against XIDE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-xide Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.