Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLG vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XDTE paid 26.5% of its price in cash against QYLG’s 17.4%, though QYLG returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
26.5%XDTE cash paid, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year
+15.6%XDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLG 71.1XDTE 41.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% as cashabout even with QQQ
XDTE1 pt behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XDTE+15.6%26.5% of it arrived as cash1 pt behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XDTE+15.6%26.5% as cash1 pt behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QYLGOnly in XDTE
NVIDIA CORP 8.44%SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 66.30%
APPLE INC 7.73%SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 24.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.77%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.23%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 1.84%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.31%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.23%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLG and XDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLGXDTEQYLGXDTEQYLGXDTE
3 months−0.1%+2.5%2.1%5.1%+2.4 pts+0.3 pts
6 months+19.6%+14.9%4.6%10.6%−4.7 pts−3.1 pts
1 year+22.2%+15.6%17.4%26.5%+0.5 pts−1.0 pts
3 years+76.2%not published51.1%not published−22.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+122.0%+45.9%75.3%59.5%−52.0 pts−6.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLG and XDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerGlobal XRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized6.8%15.2%
Expense ratio0.35%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year17.4%26.5%
Price change, 1 year+2.4%−13.4%
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+15.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+0.5 pts−1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate96%not published
Age2187 days925 days
Net assets$175m$336m

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XDTE paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLG or XDTE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 26.5%, so XDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or XDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and XDTE returned +15.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLG or XDTE?
QYLG charges 0.35% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLG against XDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against XDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources