Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLG vs ULTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ULTY paid 44.9% of its price in cash against QYLG’s 17.4%, though QYLG returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF and YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF.

17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
44.9%ULTY cash paid, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year
−7.8%ULTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLG 71.1ULTY 3.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% cashabout even with QQQ
ULTY24.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and ULTY hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QYLG and ULTY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQYLGULTY
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.97%5.23%
ALPHABET INC-CL A3.23%4.39%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A2.85%4.11%
NVIDIA CORP8.44%2.36%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A1.77%4.27%
LAM RESEARCH CORP1.57%4.34%
ANALOG DEVICES INC0.79%4.11%
SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A0.67%3.55%
MERCADOLIBRE INC0.39%4.99%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC0.36%4.75%
STRATEGY INC- CL A0.24%4.66%
ASTERA LABS INC0.23%3.35%
Only in each
Only in QYLGOnly in ULTY
APPLE INC 7.73%Comfort Systems USA Inc 4.61%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.77%Coherent Corp 4.30%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 4.07%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.31%Robinhood Markets Inc 4.07%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.11%VanEck Gold Miners ETF/USA 4.07%
TESLA INC 3.01%Figure Technology Solutions Inc 4.02%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.00%TransMedics Group Inc 3.48%
BROADCOM INC 2.67%Caterpillar Inc 3.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLG and ULTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLGULTYQYLGULTYQYLGULTY
3 months−0.1%−1.1%2.1%13.7%+2.4 pts−3.3 pts
6 months+19.6%+14.0%4.6%30.1%−4.7 pts−4.0 pts
1 year+22.2%−7.8%17.4%44.9%+0.5 pts−24.3 pts
3 years+76.2%not published51.1%not published−22.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+122.0%+10.7%75.3%86.9%−52.0 pts−44.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLG and ULTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
ULTY
YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerGlobal XYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized6.8%59.8%
Expense ratio0.35%1.30%
Cash paid, 1 year17.4%44.9%
Price change, 1 year+2.4%−54.1%
Total return, 1 year+22.2%−7.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+0.5 pts−24.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate96%100%
Age2187 days932 days
Net assets$175m$721m

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

ULTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ULTY paid 44.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 24.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 59.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLG or ULTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and ULTY paid 44.9%, so ULTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or ULTY?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and ULTY returned −7.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLG or ULTY?
QYLG charges 0.35% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLG against ULTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against ULTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-ulty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources