Data as of .
QYLG vs SPUT: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against SPUT’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and SPUT hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QYLG | SPUT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 8.44% | 3.85% |
| APPLE INC | 7.73% | 3.22% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.77% | 2.47% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.31% | 2.09% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.23% | 1.84% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.67% | 1.60% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.00% | 1.59% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.11% | 1.10% |
| TESLA INC | 3.01% | 0.91% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.99% | 0.48% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.97% | 0.47% |
| WALMART INC | 2.25% | 0.47% |
| Only in QYLG | Only in SPUT |
|---|---|
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.85% | TREASURY BILL 49.24% |
| ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS 0.68% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.70% |
| SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 0.67% | Eli Lilly & Co 0.65% |
| CASH 0.53% | Exxon Mobil Corp 0.54% |
| ARM HOLDINGS PLC-ADR 0.52% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.54% |
| NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.25% | Visa Inc 0.46% |
| HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC 0.23% | Johnson & Johnson 0.46% |
| NEBIUS GROUP NV 0.23% | Caterpillar Inc 0.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLG | SPUT | QYLG | SPUT | QYLG | SPUT | |
| 3 months | −0.1% | +2.4% | 2.1% | 1.1% | +2.4 pts | +0.1 pts |
| 6 months | +19.6% | +11.5% | 4.6% | 2.5% | −4.7 pts | −6.5 pts |
| 1 year | +22.2% | +11.5% | 17.4% | 5.2% | +0.5 pts | −5.1 pts |
| 3 years | +76.2% | not published | 51.1% | not published | −22.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +122.0% | +22.4% | 75.3% | 8.5% | −52.0 pts | −15.6 pts |
| QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | SPUT Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Innovator |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.8% | 4.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 17.4% | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +2.4% | +6.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +11.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.5 pts | −5.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 96% | not published |
| Age | 2187 days | 553 days |
| Net assets | $175m | $17m |
QYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
SPUT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPUT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QYLG or SPUT?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and SPUT paid 5.2%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or SPUT?
- With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and SPUT returned +11.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QYLG or SPUT?
- QYLG charges 0.35% a year and SPUT charges 0.79%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against SPUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-sput Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.