Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

QYLD vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XYLG paid 12.7% of its price in cash against QYLD’s 12.3%, though QYLD returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QYLD and XYLG

Net assets on Oct 12, 2026: $8.5bn for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF and $72m for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

At a glance
12.3%
QYLD cash paid, 1 year
12.7%
XYLG cash paid, 1 year
+16.5%
QYLD total return, 1 year
+15.6%
XYLG total return, 1 year
QYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD
+16.5%
QQQ
+12.3%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

12.3% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

12.3% as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

12.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 0.8 pts ahead of SPY
XYLG
+15.6%
SPY
+14.8%

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XYLG

+15.6%

12.7% of it arrived as cash

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XYLG

+15.6%

12.7% as cash

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

12.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +16.5%. XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +16.5%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XYLG costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; QYLD is far larger, $8.5bn against $72m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QYLD vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQYLDXYLG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+15.6%
Price change, 1 yearrose 3.3%rose 1.5%
Return of capital, issuer estimate99% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment80% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$8.5bn$72m
Holdings
Holdings in common54%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · QYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score72.8QYLD70.4XYLG

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Oct 2, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026 · 317 weekly returns
QYLD XYLG
Return
Total return edge XYLG +74.8% +108.2%
Annualized edge XYLG +9.6% +12.8%
Price return edge XYLG −16.8% +14.6%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 12.8% 12.6%
Max drawdown edge XYLG −24.5% −21.0%
Downside capture 64.8% 81.6%
Beta 0.55 0.78
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XYLG 0.53 0.76
Sortino edge XYLG 0.75 1.10
Treynor 0.127 0.124
Calmar edge XYLG 0.39 0.61
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.3% a year −0.3% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.37 −0.29
Information ratio −0.93 −0.71
Tracking error 10.6% 4.5%

Each against its own benchmark: QYLD against QQQ, Dec 20, 2013 to Oct 30, 2026; XYLG against SPY, Oct 2, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Oct 2020 to Oct 2026, XYLG returned more: +108.2% to +74.8%. QYLD and XYLG swung about the same: 12.8% and 12.6%. XYLG fell less at its worst: −21.0% to −24.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QYLD vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQYLDXYLGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+74.8%+108.2%XYLGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.6%+12.8%XYLGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−16.8%+14.6%XYLGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility12.8%12.6%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.0%8.7%XYLG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.5%−21.0%XYLGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture37.8%67.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture64.8%81.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.550.78Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.770.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.530.76XYLGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.751.10XYLGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1270.124Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.390.61XYLGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.3% a year−0.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.37−0.29Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.5% to +1.0%−2.5% to +1.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.93−0.71Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.6%4.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 317 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

54%

By the books each fund has filed, QYLD and XYLG hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

54% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QYLD XYLG
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.20% 7.60%
APPLE INC. 7.65% 7.09%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.82% 5.39%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.93% 4.15%
ALPHABET INC. 3.50% 3.26%
BROADCOM INC. 3.11% 2.88%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28% 2.63%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.78% 1.91%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.32% 1.45%
TESLA, INC. 2.62% 1.36%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.62% 1.21%
WALMART INC. 2.53% 0.76%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QYLD
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 0.97%
ASML Holding N.V. 0.70%
SHOPIFY INC. 0.67%
ARM Holdings PLC 0.47%
MercadoLibre, Inc. 0.45%
PDD Holdings Inc. 0.26%
Astera Labs Inc 0.24%
COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS PLC 0.23%
Only in XYLG
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.47%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.46%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.41%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION 1.00%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.96%
VISA INC. 0.94%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 0.72%
ABBVIE INC. 0.69%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 12.2% 4.4%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year 12.3% 12.7%
Price change, 1 year +3.3% +1.5%
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +15.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +14.8%
Ahead or behind +4.2 pts +0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 99% 80%
Age 12.9 years 6.1 years
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 $8.5bn $72m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QYLD vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowQYLDXYLGQYLDXYLGQYLDXYLG
3 months+2.4%+1.4%3.0%1.1%+5.9 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+5.4%+6.7%6.0%2.5%+5.8 pts+1.7 pts
1 year+16.5%+15.6%12.3%12.7%+4.2 pts+0.8 pts
3 years+52.7%+65.6%37.9%44.3%−38.6 pts−17.4 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QYLD Dec 2013 · XYLG Sep 2020+194.8%+116.0%117.5%69.8%−610.5 pts−38.4 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QYLD

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

XYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XYLG paid 12.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLD or XYLG?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting price in cash and XYLG paid 12.7%, so XYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLD or XYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLD returned +16.5% and XYLG +15.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QYLD or XYLG?
QYLD charges 0.60% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QYLD against XYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qyld-vs-xylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.