Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

QYLD vs SDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SDTY paid 24.6% of its price in cash against QYLD’s 12.3%, though QYLD returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QYLD and SDTY

Net assets: $8.5bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, and $41m on Oct 27, 2026 for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

At a glance
12.3%
QYLD cash paid, 1 year
24.6%
SDTY cash paid, 1 year
+19.3%
QYLD total return, 1 year
+13.4%
SDTY total return, 1 year
QYLD · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 4.1 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD
+19.3%
QQQ
+15.2%

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +5.8%, total +19.3%, QQQ +15.2%, +4.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

QYLD

+19.3%

12.3% of it arrived as cash

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +5.8%, total +19.3%, QQQ +15.2%, +4.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

QYLD

+19.3%

12.3% cash

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

12.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +5.8%, total +19.3%, QQQ +15.2%, +4.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
SDTY · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 About even with VOO
SDTY
+13.4%
VOO
+13.7%

About even with VOO

SDTY over 1 year: paid 24.6%, price −13.3%, total +13.4%, VOO +13.7%, −0.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

VOO

+13.7%

SDTY

+13.4%

24.6% of it arrived as cash

about even with VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with VOO

SDTY over 1 year: paid 24.6%, price −13.3%, total +13.4%, VOO +13.7%, −0.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

VOO

+13.7%

SDTY

+13.4%

24.6% as cash

about even with VOO

24.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SDTY over 1 year: paid 24.6%, price −13.3%, total +13.4%, VOO +13.7%, −0.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QYLD costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.9 points; QYLD is far larger, $8.5bn against $29m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QYLD vs SDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQYLDSDTY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+19.3%+13.4%
Price change, 1 yearrose 5.8%fell 13.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate99% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment58% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%1.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$8.5bn$29m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · QYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score82QYLD39.9SDTY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

A percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 14, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026 · 88 weekly returns
QYLD SDTY
Return
Total return edge SDTY +18.6% +21.6%
Annualized edge SDTY +10.6% +12.2%
Price return edge QYLD −3.7% −21.0%
Risk
Volatility edge QYLD (slight) 12.6% 13.9%
Max drawdown edge Tie −17.5% −17.2%
Downside capture 64.8% 91.0%
Beta 0.55 0.87
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SDTY 0.55 0.62
Sortino edge SDTY (slight) 0.75 0.82
Treynor 0.129 0.098
Calmar edge SDTY 0.61 0.71
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.3% a year −1.4% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.36 −0.47
Information ratio −0.94 −0.65
Tracking error 10.6% 4.4%

Each against its own benchmark: QYLD against QQQ, Dec 20, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SDTY against VOO, Feb 14, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SDTY returned more: +21.6% to +18.6%. QYLD swung slightly less: 12.6% to 13.9%. QYLD and SDTY fell about the same at their worst: −17.5% and −17.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QYLD vs SDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQYLDSDTYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+18.6%+21.6%SDTYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.6%+12.2%SDTYTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−3.7%−21.0%QYLDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility12.6%13.9%QYLD (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.2%10.4%QYLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−17.5%−17.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture37.8%79.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture64.8%91.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.550.87Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.770.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.550.62SDTYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.750.82SDTY (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1290.098Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.610.71SDTYAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.3% a year−1.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.36−0.47Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.5% to +1.0%−7.6% to +4.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.94−0.65Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.6%4.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 88 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, QYLD and SDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QYLD SDTY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QYLD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.20%
APPLE INC. 7.65%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.82%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.93%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.32%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.62%
ALPHABET INC. 3.50%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28%
Only in SDTY
SPX 12/18/2026 1200.26 C 85.46%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 1.61%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly SDTY YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on VOO, paying weekly
Strategy covered call 0DTE covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 11.9% 23.3%
Expense ratio 0.60% 1.08%
Cash paid, 1 year 12.3% 24.6%
Price change, 1 year +5.8% −13.3%
Total return, 1 year +19.3% +13.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.2% +13.7%
Ahead or behind +4.1 pts −0.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 99% 58%
Age 12.9 years 1.7 years
Net assets, QYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 and SDTY as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.5bn $41m

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QYLD vs SDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowQYLDSDTYQYLDSDTYQYLDSDTY
3 months+10.4%+5.8%3.1%5.7%+0.6 pts−0.3 pts
6 months+9.4%+9.7%6.1%12.1%−0.5 pts+0.6 pts
1 year+19.3%+13.4%12.3%24.6%+4.1 pts−0.3 pts
3 years+62.2%–39.3%–−51.5 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: QYLD Dec 2013 · SDTY Feb 2025+202.5%+23.9%117.5%37.5%−646.8 pts−6.1 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AE4AA3A525

QYLD and SDTY are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Income paid. QYLD paid 12.3% and SDTY 24.6% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 12.3 points.
  2. What each is measured against. QYLD is measured against Nasdaq-100 through QQQ and SDTY against Vanguard S&P 500 ETF through VOO.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SDTY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QYLD

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.1 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SDTY

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SDTY paid 24.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.4%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +13.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 58% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLD or SDTY?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting price in cash and SDTY paid 24.6%, so SDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLD or SDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLD returned +19.3% and SDTY +13.4% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QYLD or SDTY?
QYLD charges 0.60% a year and SDTY charges 1.08%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QYLD against SDTY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qyld-vs-sdty

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.