Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
QVOL vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
QVOL and QYLD both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QVOL and QYLDNet assets: $49m on Aug 31, 2026 for Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF, and $8.5bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF.
7 pts behind ONEQ
QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
ONEQ
−0.8%
QVOL
−7.8%
7 pts behind ONEQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
7 pts behind ONEQ
QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
ONEQ
−0.8%
QVOL
−7.8%
7 pts behind ONEQ
6.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QYLD
+16.5%
12.3% of it arrived as cash
4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QYLD
+16.5%
4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
12.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
QYLD costs 0.22 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | QVOL | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +16.5% |
| Price change | fell 13.6% (since May 12, 2026) | rose 3.3% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 99% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, measured through ONEQ | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 7.0 pts | ahead by 4.2 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.82% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, QVOL as of Aug 31, 2026 and QYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 | $49m | $8.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 58% | |
Risk and return
May 22, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 23 weekly returnsFrom May 2026 to Oct 2026, QYLD returned more: +5.1% to −8.8%. QYLD fell less at its worst: −3.9% to −13.9%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | QVOL | QYLD | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −8.8% | +5.1% | QYLD | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −14.4% | +0.1% | QYLD | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −13.9% | −3.9% | QYLD | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 23 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, QVOL and QYLD hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
58% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | QVOL | QYLD | QVOL | QYLD | QVOL | QYLD |
| 3 months | −12.2% | +2.4% | 3.2% | 3.0% | −10.0 pts | +5.9 pts |
| 6 months | – | +5.4% | – | 6.0% | – | +5.8 pts |
| 1 year | – | +16.5% | – | 12.3% | – | +4.2 pts |
| 3 years | – | +52.7% | – | 37.9% | – | −38.6 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: QVOL May 2026 · QYLD Dec 2013 | −7.8% | +194.8% | 6.4% | 117.5% | −7.0 pts | −610.5 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for QVOL.
QVOL
Over the period from its first trade on May 12, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, QVOL paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
QYLD
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QVOL against QYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qvol-vs-qyld
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). QVOL against QYLD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qvol-vs-qyld
[QVOL against QYLD (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qvol-vs-qyld)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.