Data as of .
QQQI vs TSLY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year TSLY paid 53.2% of its price in cash against QQQI’s 14.2%, though QQQI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TSLY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and TSLY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QQQI | Only in TSLY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 7.66% | TREASURY BILL 22.62% |
| Apple Inc 6.63% | TREASURY BILL 22.39% |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.61% | TREASURY BILL 22.04% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | TREASURY BILL 20.60% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.12% | TREASURY BILL 12.35% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.05% | |
| Tesla Inc 3.35% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.32% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | TSLY | QQQI | TSLY | QQQI | TSLY | |
| 3 months | +0.7% | −9.9% | 3.5% | 10.8% | +1.4 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +13.7% | −7.9% | 7.5% | 22.0% | −7.0 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 1 year | +16.9% | +3.9% | 14.2% | 53.2% | −6.1 pts | +4.8 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +19.4% | not published | 83.5% | not published | −17.2 pts |
| Since launch | +58.2% | +38.5% | 38.6% | 97.1% | −12.1 pts | −61.0 pts |
| QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | TSLY YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on TSLA, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Tesla (TSLA) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 14.3% | 50.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 1.07% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.2% | 53.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +1.5% | −44.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.9% | +3.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.0% | −0.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.1 pts | +4.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 98% | 100% |
| Age | 955 days | 1388 days |
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QQQI paid 14.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
TSLY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, TSLY paid 53.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 44.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.9%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −0.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 50.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QQQI or TSLY?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QQQI paid 14.2% of its starting price in cash and TSLY paid 53.2%, so TSLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or TSLY?
- With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +16.9% and TSLY returned +3.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QQQI or TSLY?
- QQQI charges 0.68% a year and TSLY charges 1.07%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against TSLY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-tsly Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.