Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QQQI vs SPUT: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QQQI paid 15.2% of its price in cash against SPUT’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF.

15.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
5.2%SPUT cash paid, 1 year
+16.4%QQQI total return, 1 year
+11.5%SPUT total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SPUT scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QQQI 50.5SPUT 633.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QQQI5.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% as cash5.3 pts behind QQQ
SPUT5.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%SPUT+11.5%5.2% as cash5.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%SPUT+11.5%5.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and SPUT hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQI and SPUT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQISPUT
NVIDIA Corp8.58%3.85%
Apple Inc7.79%3.22%
Microsoft Corp5.84%2.47%
Amazon.com Inc4.36%2.09%
Alphabet Inc3.24%1.84%
Broadcom Inc2.70%1.60%
Alphabet Inc2.99%1.59%
Meta Platforms Inc3.14%1.10%
Tesla Inc2.91%0.91%
Micron Technology Inc5.03%0.48%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.02%0.47%
Walmart Inc2.28%0.47%
Only in each
Only in QQQIOnly in SPUT
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.28%TREASURY BILL 49.24%
Shopify Inc 0.70%JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.70%
ASML Holding NV 0.68%Eli Lilly & Co 0.65%
ARM Holdings PLC 0.52%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.54%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.25%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.54%
PDD Holdings Inc 0.23%Visa Inc 0.46%
Honeywell Aerospace Inc 0.22%Johnson & Johnson 0.46%
Nebius Group NV 0.22%Caterpillar Inc 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QQQI and SPUT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QQQISPUTQQQISPUTQQQISPUT
3 months−0.7%+2.4%3.4%1.1%+1.8 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+16.7%+11.5%7.7%2.5%−7.5 pts−6.5 pts
1 year+16.4%+11.5%15.2%5.2%−5.3 pts−5.1 pts
Since launch+59.6%+22.4%39.9%8.5%−12.3 pts−15.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QQQI and SPUT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
SPUT
Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerNEOSInnovator
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized14.0%4.7%
Expense ratio0.68%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year15.2%5.2%
Price change, 1 year−0.1%+6.0%
Total return, 1 year+16.4%+11.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−5.3 pts−5.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate98%not published
Age962 days553 days
Net assets$14.8bn$17m

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

SPUT in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPUT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QQQI or SPUT?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting price in cash and SPUT paid 5.2%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or SPUT?
With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +16.4% and SPUT returned +11.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or SPUT?
QQQI charges 0.68% a year and SPUT charges 0.79%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQI against SPUT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against SPUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-sput Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources