Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QLDY vs TDAQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QLDY paid 29.2% of its price in cash against TDAQ’s 17.4%, though TDAQ returned more with it reinvested.

Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread(TM) Income ETF and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF.

29.2%QLDY cash paid, 1 year
17.4%TDAQ cash paid, 1 year
+10.6%QLDY total return, 1 year
+22.8%TDAQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TDAQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QLDY 19.1TDAQ 74.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QLDY11.2 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QLDY+10.6%29.2% of it arrived as cash11.2 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QLDY+10.6%11.2 pts behind QQQ
TDAQ1 pt ahead of QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% of it arrived as cash1 pt ahead of QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% as cash1 pt ahead of QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QLDY and TDAQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QLDYOnly in TDAQ
Ndx 12/18/2026 2001.44 C 94.80%Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 100.00%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 4.77%
United States Treasury Note/bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 0.53%
Ndxp Us 09/21/26 P29500 0.08%
Xnd 12/18/2026 10.44 C 0.05%
Cash & Other -0.06%
Nasdaq-1 Put Opt 09/26 29650 -0.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QLDY and TDAQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QLDYTDAQQLDYTDAQQLDYTDAQ
3 months−6.6%−1.0%8.3%4.1%−4.1 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+20.1%+22.7%18.7%9.7%−4.2 pts−1.6 pts
1 year+10.6%+22.8%29.2%17.4%−11.2 pts+1.0 pts
Since launch+10.6%+27.2%29.2%18.0%−11.2 pts+1.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QLDY and TDAQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QLDY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread(TM) Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying weekly
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerDefianceTappAlpha
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.6%17.1%
Expense ratio1.04%0.83%
Cash paid, 1 year29.2%17.4%
Price change, 1 year−20.3%+3.4%
Total return, 1 year+10.6%+22.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−11.2 pts+1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age365 days379 days
Net assets$52m$248m

QLDY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QLDY paid 29.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.6%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TDAQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDAQ paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QLDY or TDAQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QLDY paid 29.2% of its starting price in cash and TDAQ paid 17.4%, so QLDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QLDY or TDAQ?
With every distribution reinvested, QLDY returned +10.6% and TDAQ returned +22.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TDAQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, QLDY or TDAQ?
QLDY charges 1.04% a year and TDAQ charges 0.83%, so TDAQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QLDY against TDAQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QLDY against TDAQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qldy-vs-tdaq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources