Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PAPI vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year PAPI paid 7.9% of its price in cash against XIJN’s 6.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June.

7.9%PAPI cash paid, 1 year
6.9%XIJN cash paid, 1 year
+12.8%PAPI total return, 1 year
+6.2%XIJN total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: PAPI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

PAPI 62.8XIJN 39.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

PAPI3.8 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%PAPI+12.8%7.9% of it arrived as cash3.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%PAPI+12.8%3.8 pts behind SPY
XIJN10.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XIJN+6.2%6.9% of it arrived as cash10.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XIJN+6.2%10.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PAPI and XIJN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in PAPIOnly in XIJN
Corning, Inc. 1.01%2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07 100.51%
TD SYNNEX Corp. 0.81%2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.73 3.76%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 0.77%US Dollar 0.76%
Power Integrations, Inc. 0.73%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56%
Royalty Pharma plc 0.73%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56%
Millicom International Cellular SA 0.72%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55%
Avnet, Inc. 0.71%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55%
Texas Instruments, Inc. 0.71%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

PAPI and XIJN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PAPIXIJNPAPIXIJNPAPIXIJN
3 months+4.7%+1.8%2.0%1.1%+2.5 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+5.6%+4.0%4.0%3.5%−12.4 pts−14.0 pts
1 year+12.8%+6.2%7.9%6.9%−3.8 pts−10.3 pts
Since launch+35.6%+16.6%22.5%14.7%−49.6 pts−27.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PAPI and XIJN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
XIJN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerParametricFirst Trust
Strategycovered callbuffer with income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.2%6.7%
Expense ratio0.29%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year7.9%6.9%
Price change, 1 year+4.5%−0.9%
Total return, 1 year+12.8%+6.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−3.8 pts−10.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1065 days816 days
Net assets$400m$53m

PAPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PAPI paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.2%, paid monthly.

XIJN in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, PAPI or XIJN?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PAPI paid 7.9% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so PAPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, PAPI or XIJN?
With every distribution reinvested, PAPI returned +12.8% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so PAPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, PAPI or XIJN?
PAPI charges 0.29% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so PAPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PAPI against XIJN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PAPI against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/papi-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources