Data as of .
OVLH vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QUSA paid 13.8% of its price in cash against OVLH’s 0.3%, though OVLH returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OVLH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OVLH and QUSA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OVLH | Only in QUSA |
|---|---|
| Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% | Microsoft Corp 6.08% |
| Apple Inc 5.99% | |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.78% | |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35% | |
| Caterpillar Inc 4.91% | |
| Broadcom Inc 4.70% | |
| Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40% | |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVLH | QUSA | OVLH | QUSA | OVLH | QUSA | |
| 3 months | +0.5% | −1.9% | 0.0% | 3.6% | −1.7 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +11.0% | +10.4% | 0.0% | 7.8% | −7.0 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | +9.1% | +3.5% | 0.3% | 13.8% | −7.5 pts | −11.7 pts |
| 3 years | +54.7% | not published | 1.7% | not published | −23.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +73.7% | +4.9% | 3.1% | 15.1% | −45.2 pts | −25.8 pts |
| OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay, hedged on SPY, paying annual | QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Overlay Shares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | put-selling overlay, hedged | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy |
| Pays | annual | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 0.3% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.3% | 13.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.8% | −11.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.1% | +3.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +15.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −7.5 pts | −11.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 2072 days | 500 days |
| Net assets | $116m | $22m |
OVLH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVLH paid 0.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.3%, paid annual.
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OVLH or QUSA?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVLH paid 0.3% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 13.8%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OVLH or QUSA?
- With every distribution reinvested, OVLH returned +9.1% and QUSA returned +3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OVLH returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OVLH against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ovlh-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.