Data as of .
OVL vs SCLZ: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OVL paid 8.9% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OVL scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OVL and SCLZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OVL | Only in SCLZ |
|---|---|
| Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.89% |
| APPLE INC 6.15% | |
| NVIDIA CORP 5.99% | |
| ALPHABET INC 5.18% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14% | |
| BROADCOM INC 4.71% | |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVL | SCLZ | OVL | SCLZ | OVL | SCLZ | |
| 3 months | +2.3% | +2.9% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 0.0 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +18.8% | +14.2% | 5.7% | 3.8% | +0.7 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 1 year | +19.2% | +13.2% | 8.9% | 8.4% | +2.6 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 3 years | +86.2% | not published | 21.1% | not published | +7.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +203.4% | +36.5% | 47.2% | 19.6% | +16.1 pts | −6.3 pts |
| OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay on SPY, paying monthly | SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Overlay Shares | Swan |
| Strategy | put-selling overlay | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.4% | 8.5% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.9% | 8.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.4% | +4.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.2% | +13.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +2.6 pts | −14.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 2544 days | 934 days |
| Net assets | $276m | $20m |
OVL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVL paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid monthly.
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OVL or SCLZ?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVL paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.4%, so OVL paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OVL or SCLZ?
- With every distribution reinvested, OVL returned +19.2% and SCLZ returned +13.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OVL returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OVL against SCLZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ovl-vs-sclz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.