Data as of .
OARK vs XSPI: which paid, and which earned it?
OARK and XSPI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OARK and XSPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OARK | Only in XSPI |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 31.97% | NVIDIA Corp 8.50% |
| United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 31.91% | Apple Inc 7.83% |
| United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 22.43% | Microsoft Corp 5.80% |
| 2ARKK US 11/20/26 C85.01 FLX 8.43% | Amazon.com Inc 3.94% |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 6.55% | Alphabet Inc 3.24% |
| United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 3.23% | Broadcom Inc 2.65% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 1.09% | Alphabet Inc 2.57% |
| ARKK US 09/25/26 C86 0.66% | Meta Platforms Inc 2.25% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OARK | XSPI | OARK | XSPI | OARK | XSPI | |
| 3 months | +3.9% | +3.7% | 9.0% | 4.2% | +6.4 pts | +1.4 pts |
| 6 months | +20.0% | +20.0% | 22.6% | 9.2% | −4.2 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 1 year | +6.6% | not published | 37.4% | not published | −15.2 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +61.9% | not published | 87.5% | not published | −36.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +58.8% | +11.6% | 89.4% | 11.1% | −96.7 pts | +0.2 pts |
| OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500(R) High Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | NEOS |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 27.9% | 17.1% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 37.4% | 11.1% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −34.0% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.6% | +11.6% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +11.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −15.2 pts | +0.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 0% | 99% |
| Age | 1395 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $32m | $113m |
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OARK paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 34.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XSPI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSPI paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, OARK or XSPI?
- OARK charges 1.00% a year and XSPI charges 0.98%, so XSPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against XSPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-xspi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.