Data as of .
OARK vs ULTY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year ULTY paid 46.9% of its price in cash against OARK’s 38.6%, though OARK returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OARK scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OARK and ULTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OARK | Only in ULTY |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 37.81% | Alphabet Inc 5.66% |
| TREASURY BILL 30.32% | Analog Devices Inc 5.47% |
| TREASURY BILL 18.55% | Amazon.com Inc 5.16% |
| TREASURY BILL 10.80% | Lam Research Corp 4.99% |
| TREASURY BILL 2.51% | Ciena Corp 4.95% |
| Quanta Services Inc 4.95% | |
| Lumentum Holdings Inc 4.86% | |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.80% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OARK | ULTY | OARK | ULTY | OARK | ULTY | |
| 3 months | +5.1% | −0.3% | 9.6% | 14.2% | +5.9 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +15.3% | +11.2% | 22.6% | 29.8% | −5.4 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 1 year | +7.2% | −5.8% | 38.6% | 46.9% | −15.8 pts | −23.3 pts |
| 3 years | +48.6% | not published | 82.9% | not published | −46.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +53.5% | +9.0% | 89.2% | 86.7% | −99.6 pts | −45.9 pts |
| OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | ULTY YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | YieldMax |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 37.1% | 61.5% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 1.30% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 38.6% | 46.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −33.3% | −53.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | −5.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.0% | +17.5% |
| Ahead or behind | −15.8 pts | −23.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 39% | 100% |
| Age | 1388 days | 925 days |
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
ULTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, ULTY paid 46.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 53.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −5.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 23.3 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 61.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OARK or ULTY?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting price in cash and ULTY paid 46.9%, so ULTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or ULTY?
- With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +7.2% and ULTY returned −5.8% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so OARK returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OARK or ULTY?
- OARK charges 1.00% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so OARK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against ULTY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-ulty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.