Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MSTY vs RYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MSTY paid 35.1% of its price in cash against RYLD’s 12.3%, though RYLD returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

35.1%MSTY cash paid, 1 year
12.3%RYLD cash paid, 1 year
−54.4%MSTY total return, 1 year
+18.1%RYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MSTY 49.1RYLD 65.79.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MSTY5.5 pts ahead of MSTR · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
MSTR−59.8%MSTY−54.4%5.5 pts ahead of MSTRTotal return, distributions reinvestedMSTR−59.8%MSTY−54.4%5.5 pts ahead of MSTR
RYLD3.1 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
IWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%12.3% cash3.1 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%3.1 pts behind IWM

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MSTY and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MSTYOnly in RYLD
TREASURY BILL 21.68%GLOBAL X RUSSELL 2000 ETF 99.96%
TREASURY BILL 21.18%CASH 0.04%
TREASURY BILL 20.64%
TREASURY BILL 17.38%
TREASURY BILL 15.04%
TREASURY BILL 4.07%
Strategy Inc 0.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jan 31, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MSTY and RYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MSTYRYLDMSTYRYLDMSTYRYLD
3 months+3.8%+3.9%16.1%3.1%−1.8 pts+5.1 pts
6 months−7.2%+13.1%32.0%6.3%−1.0 pts−4.5 pts
1 year−54.4%+18.1%35.1%12.3%+5.5 pts−3.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+30.9%not published32.7%not published−31.7 pts
Since launch+56.5%+51.9%223.1%67.2%−27.1 pts−51.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MSTY and RYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSTY
YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on MSTR, paying weekly
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxGlobal X
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkMicroStrategy (MSTR)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized110.5%12.4%
Expense ratio0.99%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year35.1%12.3%
Price change, 1 year−80.9%+4.7%
Total return, 1 year−54.4%+18.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year−59.8%+21.2%
Ahead or behind+5.5 pts−3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate99%100%
Age932 days2699 days

MSTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, MSTY paid 35.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 80.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −54.4%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −59.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.5 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 110.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

RYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, RYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +21.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MSTY or RYLD?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, MSTY paid 35.1% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.3%, so MSTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSTY or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, MSTY returned −54.4% and RYLD returned +18.1% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so RYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, MSTY or RYLD?
MSTY charges 0.99% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so RYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MSTY against RYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSTY against RYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/msty-vs-ryld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources