Data as of .
MAGY vs OVLH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against OVLH’s 0.3%, though OVLH returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OVLH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and OVLH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGY | Only in OVLH |
|---|---|
| Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% | |
| MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGY | OVLH | MAGY | OVLH | MAGY | OVLH | |
| 3 months | +3.7% | +0.5% | 6.1% | 0.0% | −3.9 pts | −1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +11.0% | 12.9% | 0.0% | −12.7 pts | −7.0 pts |
| 1 year | +1.8% | +9.1% | 26.5% | 0.3% | −9.4 pts | −7.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +54.7% | not published | 1.7% | not published | −23.7 pts |
| Since launch | +25.6% | +73.7% | 42.0% | 3.1% | −37.5 pts | −45.2 pts |
| MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay, hedged on SPY, paying annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | Overlay Shares |
| Strategy | covered call | put-selling overlay, hedged |
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | annual |
| Payout rate, annualized | 19.2% | 0.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 26.5% | 0.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −25.3% | +8.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.8% | +9.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.2% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.4 pts | −7.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 513 days | 2072 days |
| Net assets | $102m | $116m |
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
OVLH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVLH paid 0.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.3%, paid annual.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, MAGY or OVLH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and OVLH paid 0.3%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or OVLH?
- With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and OVLH returned +9.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OVLH returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against OVLH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-ovlh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.