Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LJUL vs SDVD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year SDVD paid 9.2% of its price in cash against LJUL’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July and FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

5.2%LJUL cash paid, 1 year
9.2%SDVD cash paid, 1 year
+5.0%LJUL total return, 1 year
+10.8%SDVD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SDVD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LJUL 37.6SDVD 37.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LJUL11.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LJUL+5.0%5.2% as cash11.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LJUL+5.0%11.5 pts behind SPY
SDVD16.4 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%9.2% of it arrived as cash16.4 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%16.4 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LJUL and SDVD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in LJULOnly in SDVD
TREASURY BILL 99.57%National HealthCare Corporation 1.12%
TREASURY BILL 0.43%First BanCorp. 1.04%
OFG Bancorp 1.03%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01%
Interparfums, Inc. 1.00%
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00%
VeriSign, Inc. 1.00%
Assurant, Inc. 0.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LJUL and SDVD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LJULSDVDLJULSDVDLJULSDVD
3 months+1.5%−0.1%1.3%2.1%−0.8 pts−6.7 pts
6 months+3.1%+8.3%2.6%4.4%−14.9 pts−4.3 pts
1 year+5.0%+10.8%5.2%9.2%−11.5 pts−16.4 pts
3 yearsnot published+53.0%not published30.7%not published−0.7 pts
Since launch+13.2%+47.6%11.7%29.7%−30.2 pts−4.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LJUL and SDVD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LJUL
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
SDVD
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorFirst Trust
Strategybuffer with incomedividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized5.3%8.8%
Expense ratio0.79%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year5.2%9.2%
Price change, 1 year−0.3%+1.2%
Total return, 1 year+5.0%+10.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+27.2%
Ahead or behind−11.5 pts−16.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age809 days1135 days
Net assets$9m$888m

LJUL in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly.

SDVD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LJUL or SDVD?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting price in cash and SDVD paid 9.2%, so SDVD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LJUL or SDVD?
With every distribution reinvested, LJUL returned +5.0% and SDVD returned +10.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SDVD returned more.
Which is cheaper, LJUL or SDVD?
LJUL charges 0.79% a year and SDVD charges 0.85%, so LJUL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LJUL against SDVD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LJUL against SDVD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljul-vs-sdvd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources