Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

KYLD vs SDVD: which paid, and which earned it?

KYLD and SDVD both write options for income.

Kurv High Income ETF and FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

20.9%KYLD cash paid, 1 year
9.2%SDVD cash paid, 1 year
+2.0%KYLD total return, 1 year
+10.8%SDVD total return, 1 year
KYLD10.9 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+12.9%KYLD+2.0%10.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+12.9%KYLD+2.0%10.9 pts behind SPY
SDVD16.4 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%9.2% of it arrived as cash16.4 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%16.4 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KYLD and SDVD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions KYLD and SDVD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingKYLDSDVD
BWX Technologies Inc5.38%0.38%
Only in each
Only in KYLDOnly in SDVD
TREASURY BILL 12.96%National HealthCare Corporation 1.12%
TREASURY BILL 11.01%First BanCorp. 1.04%
Global X Silver Miners ETF 7.09%OFG Bancorp 1.03%
VanEck Gold Miners ETF/USA 6.38%The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.21%Interparfums, Inc. 1.00%
Intel Corp 6.19%Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 5.97%VeriSign, Inc. 1.00%
Teradyne Inc 5.77%Assurant, Inc. 0.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

KYLD and SDVD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
KYLDSDVDKYLDSDVDKYLDSDVD
3 months−6.3%−0.1%5.6%2.1%−8.5 pts−6.7 pts
6 months+24.4%+8.3%14.1%4.4%+6.4 pts−4.3 pts
1 yearnot published+10.8%not published9.2%not published−16.4 pts
3 yearsnot published+53.0%not published30.7%not published−0.7 pts
Since launch+2.0%+47.6%20.9%29.7%−10.9 pts−4.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
KYLD and SDVD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KYLD
Kurv High Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying weekly
SDVD
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerKurvFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomedividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyUS dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized25.6%8.8%
Expense ratio1.00%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year20.9% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025)9.2%
Price change, 1 year−20.5%+1.2%
Total return, 1 year+2.0% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025)+10.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+12.9%+27.2%
Ahead or behind−10.9 pts−16.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age322 days1135 days
Net assets$49m$888m

KYLD in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 31, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, KYLD paid 20.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.6%, paid weekly. Kurv estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

SDVD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, KYLD or SDVD?
KYLD charges 1.00% a year and SDVD charges 0.85%, so SDVD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KYLD against SDVD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KYLD against SDVD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kyld-vs-sdvd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources