Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

KNG vs LAPR: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year KNG paid 8.5% of its price in cash against LAPR’s 5.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April.

8.5%KNG cash paid, 1 year
5.9%LAPR cash paid, 1 year
+8.3%KNG total return, 1 year
+6.1%LAPR total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: KNG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

KNG 53.8LAPR 42.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

KNG1.6 pts behind NOBL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
NOBL+9.9%KNG+8.3%8.5% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind NOBLTotal return, distributions reinvestedNOBL+9.9%KNG+8.3%8.5% cash1.6 pts behind NOBL
LAPR10.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%5.9% of it arrived as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%10.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KNG and LAPR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in KNGOnly in LAPR
Johnson & Johnson 1.85%TREASURY BILL 94.62%
Nucor Corporation 1.85%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.77%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Chubb Limited 1.74%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Becton, Dickinson and Company 1.72%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
The Procter & Gamble Company 1.72%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 1.71%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Walmart Inc. 1.71%TREASURY BILL 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

KNG and LAPR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
KNGLAPRKNGLAPRKNGLAPR
3 months+1.8%+1.3%2.2%1.7%−0.1 pts−0.9 pts
6 months+7.1%+3.8%4.4%3.3%−0.9 pts−14.2 pts
1 year+8.3%+6.1%8.5%5.9%−1.6 pts−10.5 pts
3 years+24.0%not published25.4%not published−4.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+101.5%+16.1%59.4%13.8%−15.2 pts−34.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
KNG and LAPR on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on NOBL, paying monthly
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Strategydividend stocks with call overlaybuffer with income
BenchmarkS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.8%6.7%
Expense ratio0.74%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year8.5%5.9%
Price change, 1 year−0.4%0.0%
Total return, 1 year+8.3%+6.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+9.9%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−1.6 pts−10.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age3097 days900 days
Net assets$3.3bn$11m

KNG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.3%. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) returned +9.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

LAPR in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, KNG or LAPR?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting price in cash and LAPR paid 5.9%, so KNG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, KNG or LAPR?
With every distribution reinvested, KNG returned +8.3% and LAPR returned +6.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so KNG returned more.
Which is cheaper, KNG or LAPR?
KNG charges 0.74% a year and LAPR charges 0.79%, so KNG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KNG against LAPR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KNG against LAPR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kng-vs-lapr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources