Data as of .
KIQQ vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
KIQQ and XQQI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KIQQ and XQQI hold 101% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KIQQ | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 8.90% | 8.70% |
| APPLE INC | 8.20% | 7.91% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 6.17% | 5.94% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.14% | 5.12% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.50% | 4.39% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.21% | 4.08% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.40% | 3.28% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.31% | 3.27% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.15% | 3.02% |
| TESLA INC | 3.19% | 3.01% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.76% | 2.75% |
| INTEL CORP | 2.66% | 2.44% |
| Only in KIQQ | Only in XQQI |
|---|---|
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% | NDX US 10/16/26 C30300 0.43% |
| Cash 0.37% | NDX US 10/16/26 C30425 -0.25% |
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS -107.91% | NDX US 10/16/26 C29975 -0.47% |
| NDX US 10/16/26 P30300 -1.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIQQ | XQQI | KIQQ | XQQI | KIQQ | XQQI | |
| 3 months | −3.2% | −2.7% | 1.9% | 4.8% | −0.7 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +21.8% | 4.5% | 11.4% | −12.3 pts | −2.4 pts |
| Since launch | +6.0% | +14.3% | 5.8% | 13.7% | −9.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | NEOS |
| Strategy | buffer with income | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.3% | 20.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.9% | +17.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 254 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $3m | $351m |
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KIQQ or XQQI?
- KIQQ charges 0.79% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so KIQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KIQQ against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.