Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JULJ vs XIMR: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XIMR paid 6.7% of its price in cash against JULJ’s 5.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March.

5.5%JULJ cash paid, 1 year
6.7%XIMR cash paid, 1 year
+5.1%JULJ total return, 1 year
+7.5%XIMR total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XIMR scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

JULJ 36.4XIMR 48.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

JULJ11.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULJ+5.1%5.5% of it arrived as cash11.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULJ+5.1%11.5 pts behind SPY
XIMR9.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XIMR+7.5%6.7% of it arrived as cash9.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XIMR+7.5%9.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JULJ and XIMR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JULJOnly in XIMR
TREASURY BILL 100.00%2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.06 114.57%
2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 648.56 1.15%
US Dollar 0.78%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.60%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.60%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.59%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.59%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JULJ and XIMR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JULJXIMRJULJXIMRJULJXIMR
3 months+1.5%+1.5%1.3%1.8%−0.7 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+3.1%+5.0%2.6%3.1%−14.9 pts−13.1 pts
1 year+5.1%+7.5%5.5%6.7%−11.5 pts−9.1 pts
3 years+18.8%not published17.4%not published−59.6 ptsnot published
Since launch+20.4%+19.2%17.6%16.2%−58.1 pts−32.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JULJ and XIMR on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
XIMR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorFirst Trust
Strategydefined incomebuffer with income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized5.2%7.3%
Expense ratio0.79%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year5.5%6.7%
Price change, 1 year−0.6%+0.5%
Total return, 1 year+5.1%+7.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.5 pts−9.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1173 days913 days
Net assets$14m$27m

JULJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULJ paid 5.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.2%, paid quarterly.

XIMR in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIMR paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULJ or XIMR?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULJ paid 5.5% of its starting price in cash and XIMR paid 6.7%, so XIMR paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULJ or XIMR?
With every distribution reinvested, JULJ returned +5.1% and XIMR returned +7.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XIMR returned more.
Which is cheaper, JULJ or XIMR?
JULJ charges 0.79% a year and XIMR charges 0.85%, so JULJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JULJ against XIMR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULJ against XIMR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julj-vs-ximr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources