Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JUDO vs LJUL: which paid, and which earned it?

JUDO and LJUL both write options for income.

Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July.

2.6%JUDO cash paid, 1 year
5.2%LJUL cash paid, 1 year
+14.7%JUDO total return, 1 year
+5.0%LJUL total return, 1 year
JUDO1.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JUDO+14.7%2.6% as cash1.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JUDO+14.7%1.8 pts behind SPY
LJUL11.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LJUL+5.0%5.2% of it arrived as cash11.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LJUL+5.0%11.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JUDO and LJUL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JUDOOnly in LJUL
NVIDIA Corp. 8.32%TREASURY BILL 99.57%
Alphabet, Inc. 7.49%TREASURY BILL 0.43%
Microsoft Corp. 6.00%
Amazon.com, Inc. 5.20%
Apple, Inc. 4.88%
Broadcom, Inc. 3.92%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.30%
Eli Lilly & Co. 2.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JUDO and LJUL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JUDOLJULJUDOLJULJUDOLJUL
3 months+1.8%+1.5%1.5%1.3%−0.5 pts−0.8 pts
6 monthsnot published+3.1%not published2.6%not published−14.9 pts
1 yearnot published+5.0%not published5.2%not published−11.5 pts
Since launch+14.7%+13.2%2.6%11.7%−1.8 pts−30.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JUDO and LJUL on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JUDO
Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
LJUL
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerJanus HendersonInnovator
Strategycovered callbuffer with income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.4%5.3%
Expense ratio0.55%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year2.6% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026)5.2%
Price change, 1 year+12.1%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+14.7% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026)+5.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−1.8 pts−11.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age177 days809 days
Net assets$7m$9m

JUDO in plain words

Over the period since launch on Mar 25, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, JUDO paid 2.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid monthly.

LJUL in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, JUDO or LJUL?
JUDO charges 0.55% a year and LJUL charges 0.79%, so JUDO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JUDO against LJUL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JUDO against LJUL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/judo-vs-ljul Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources