Data as of .
JOYT vs TDAQ: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year TDAQ paid 17.4% of its price in cash against JOYT’s 0.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JOYT scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JOYT and TDAQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in JOYT | Only in TDAQ |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 8.64% | Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 100.00% |
| Apple, Inc. 6.51% | |
| Alphabet, Inc. 5.94% | |
| Microsoft Corp. 5.68% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.78% | |
| Broadcom, Inc. 2.98% | |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.73% | |
| Wells Fargo & Co. 2.22% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOYT | TDAQ | JOYT | TDAQ | JOYT | TDAQ | |
| 3 months | +3.8% | −1.0% | 0.2% | 4.1% | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +22.7% | 0.4% | 9.7% | −6.1 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 1 year | +15.9% | +22.8% | 0.7% | 17.4% | −0.7 pts | +1.0 pts |
| Since launch | +19.6% | +27.2% | 0.7% | 18.0% | −1.1 pts | +1.2 pts |
| JOYT JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF Option income on SPY, paying quarterly | TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | TappAlpha |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 0.7% | 17.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.83% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.7% | 17.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +15.2% | +3.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.9% | +22.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.7 pts | +1.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 395 days | 379 days |
| Net assets | $108m | $248m |
JOYT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JOYT paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 15.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.7%, paid quarterly.
TDAQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDAQ paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JOYT or TDAQ?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JOYT paid 0.7% of its starting price in cash and TDAQ paid 17.4%, so TDAQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JOYT or TDAQ?
- With every distribution reinvested, JOYT returned +15.9% and TDAQ returned +22.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TDAQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JOYT or TDAQ?
- JOYT charges 0.35% a year and TDAQ charges 0.83%, so JOYT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JOYT against TDAQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/joyt-vs-tdaq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.