Data as of .
JOYT vs LJUL: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year LJUL paid 5.2% of its price in cash against JOYT’s 0.7%, though JOYT returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JOYT scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JOYT and LJUL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in JOYT | Only in LJUL |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 8.64% | TREASURY BILL 99.57% |
| Apple, Inc. 6.51% | TREASURY BILL 0.43% |
| Alphabet, Inc. 5.94% | |
| Microsoft Corp. 5.68% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.78% | |
| Broadcom, Inc. 2.98% | |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.73% | |
| Wells Fargo & Co. 2.22% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOYT | LJUL | JOYT | LJUL | JOYT | LJUL | |
| 3 months | +3.8% | +1.5% | 0.2% | 1.3% | +1.5 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +3.1% | 0.4% | 2.6% | −6.1 pts | −14.9 pts |
| 1 year | +15.9% | +5.0% | 0.7% | 5.2% | −0.7 pts | −11.5 pts |
| Since launch | +19.6% | +13.2% | 0.7% | 11.7% | −1.1 pts | −30.2 pts |
| JOYT JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF Option income on SPY, paying quarterly | LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | Innovator |
| Strategy | option income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 0.7% | 5.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.7% | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +15.2% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.9% | +5.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.7 pts | −11.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 395 days | 809 days |
| Net assets | $108m | $9m |
JOYT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JOYT paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 15.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.7%, paid quarterly.
LJUL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JOYT or LJUL?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JOYT paid 0.7% of its starting price in cash and LJUL paid 5.2%, so LJUL paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JOYT or LJUL?
- With every distribution reinvested, JOYT returned +15.9% and LJUL returned +5.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JOYT returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JOYT or LJUL?
- JOYT charges 0.35% a year and LJUL charges 0.79%, so JOYT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JOYT against LJUL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/joyt-vs-ljul Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.