Data as of .
JEPQ vs TSPY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year TSPY paid 14.1% of its price in cash against JEPQ’s 11.9%, though JEPQ returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JEPQ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JEPQ and TSPY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in JEPQ | Only in TSPY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 6.68% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| Apple, Inc. 5.83% | |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 5.58% | |
| Alphabet, Inc. 5.05% | |
| Microsoft Corp. 3.90% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.87% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 3.67% | |
| Lam Research Corp. 2.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEPQ | TSPY | JEPQ | TSPY | JEPQ | TSPY | |
| 3 months | +1.6% | +2.3% | 3.3% | 3.5% | +4.1 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 6 months | +15.1% | +16.4% | 6.7% | 7.6% | −9.2 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 1 year | +18.5% | +15.1% | 11.9% | 14.1% | −3.2 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 3 years | +73.0% | not published | 37.2% | not published | −25.1 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +91.7% | +37.3% | 49.2% | 28.7% | −33.0 pts | −4.0 pts |
| JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | TappAlpha |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 13.6% | 14.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.77% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.9% | 14.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +5.7% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.5% | +15.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.2 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1598 days | 764 days |
| Net assets | $43.0bn | $311m |
JEPQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JEPQ paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.6%, paid monthly.
TSPY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TSPY paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JEPQ or TSPY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JEPQ paid 11.9% of its starting price in cash and TSPY paid 14.1%, so TSPY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JEPQ or TSPY?
- With every distribution reinvested, JEPQ returned +18.5% and TSPY returned +15.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JEPQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JEPQ or TSPY?
- JEPQ charges 0.35% a year and TSPY charges 0.77%, so JEPQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JEPQ against TSPY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/jepq-vs-tspy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.