IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

JANH vs XRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XRMI paid 11.9% of its price in cash against JANH’s 6.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JANH and XRMI

Net assets: $12m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January, and $62m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF.

JANH on its own →XRMI on its own →
At a glance
6.2%
JANH cash paid, 1 year
11.9%
XRMI cash paid, 1 year
+6.5%
JANH total return, 1 year
+8.7%
XRMI total return, 1 year
JANH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.3 pts behind SPY
JANH
+6.5%
SPY
+14.8%

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

8.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

8.3 pts behind SPY

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XRMI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 6.1 pts behind SPY
XRMI
+8.7%
SPY
+14.8%

6.1 pts behind SPY

XRMI over 1 year: paid 11.9%, price −3.8%, total +8.7%, SPY +14.8%, −6.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XRMI

+8.7%

11.9% of it arrived as cash

6.1 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

6.1 pts behind SPY

XRMI over 1 year: paid 11.9%, price −3.8%, total +8.7%, SPY +14.8%, −6.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XRMI

+8.7%

11.9% cash

6.1 pts behind SPY

11.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XRMI over 1 year: paid 11.9%, price −3.8%, total +8.7%, SPY +14.8%, −6.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XRMI costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; XRMI is 5.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JANH vs XRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureJANHXRMI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+8.7%
Price change, 1 yearrose 0.1%fell 3.8%
Return of capital, issuer estimate50% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment95% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$12m$62m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · JANH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score61.1JANH45.2XRMI

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JANH and XRMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JANH XRMI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in JANH
Only in XRMI
NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.63%
APPLE INC. 7.12%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.42%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.17%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28%
BROADCOM INC. 2.89%
ALPHABET INC. 2.64%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JANH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF · Option income on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer Innovator Global X
Strategy defined income option income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.2% 10.6%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.2% 11.9%
Price change, 1 year +0.1% −3.8%
Total return, 1 year +6.5% +8.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −8.3 pts −6.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 50% 95%
Age 2.8 years 5.2 years
Net assets, JANH as of Nov 4, 2026 and XRMI as of Oct 12, 2026 $12m $62m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JANH vs XRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJANHXRMIJANHXRMIJANHXRMI
3 months+1.3%+1.6%1.6%2.9%+1.4 pts+1.8 pts
6 months+3.3%+5.4%3.1%6.0%−1.7 pts+0.4 pts
1 year+6.5%+8.7%6.2%11.9%−8.3 pts−6.1 pts
3 years–+30.8%–35.1%–−52.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: JANH Jan 2024 · XRMI Aug 2021+20.6%+17.6%17.7%45.0%−47.0 pts−66.7 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

JANH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JANH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 50% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

XRMI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XRMI paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JANH or XRMI?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 11.9%, so XRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or XRMI?
With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and XRMI +8.7% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JANH or XRMI?
JANH charges 0.79% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so XRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
JANH vs WDTEJANH vs BIGYJANH vs APRJJANH vs APRHXRMI vs JULJXRMI vs JANJXRMI vs NLSIXRMI vs SPYI
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →JANH on its own →XRMI on its own →JANH dividend history →XRMI dividend history →XRMI holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
JANH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
JANH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
JANH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Innovator page for JANH ↗
XRMI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
XRMI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
XRMI 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Global X page for XRMI ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JANH against XRMI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-xrmi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.