Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JANH vs QDTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against JANH’s 6.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January and YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

6.1%JANH cash paid, 1 year
30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
+6.5%JANH total return, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JANH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

JANH 44.4QDTY 373.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

JANH10.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JANH+6.5%6.1% as cash10.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JANH+6.5%10.1 pts behind SPY
QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JANH and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JANHOnly in QDTY
TREASURY BILL 96.95%NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19%
TREASURY BILL 1.53%XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21%
TREASURY BILL 1.52%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53%
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JANH and QDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JANHQDTYJANHQDTYJANHQDTY
3 months+1.6%−0.9%1.6%7.9%−0.6 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+6.9%+20.7%3.2%17.3%−11.1 pts−3.6 pts
1 year+6.5%+20.2%6.1%30.9%−10.1 pts−1.6 pts
Since launch+19.8%+27.1%16.1%42.0%−46.6 pts−8.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JANH and QDTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerInnovatorYieldMax
Strategydefined income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysquarterlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized6.2%25.9%
Expense ratio0.79%1.17%
Cash paid, 1 year6.1%30.9%
Price change, 1 year0.0%−14.0%
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+20.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−10.1 pts−1.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published94%
Age990 days582 days
Net assets$14m$27m

JANH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANH paid 6.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly.

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JANH or QDTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANH paid 6.1% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.9%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or QDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and QDTY returned +20.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, JANH or QDTY?
JANH charges 0.79% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so JANH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JANH against QDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JANH against QDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-qdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources