Which paid more, JANH or OCTJ?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting price in cash and OCTJ paid 5.3%, so JANH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or OCTJ?

With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and OCTJ +5.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, JANH or OCTJ?

JANH and OCTJ both charge 0.79% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

JANH vs OCTJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its price in cash against OCTJ’s 5.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JANH and OCTJ

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $12m for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January and $15m for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October.

JANH on its own →OCTJ on its own →

At a glance

6.2%

JANH cash paid, 1 year

5.3%

OCTJ cash paid, 1 year

+6.5%

JANH total return, 1 year

+5.8%

OCTJ total return, 1 year

JANH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH

+6.5%

SPY

+14.8%

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

8.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

8.3 pts behind SPY

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

OCTJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9 pts behind SPY

OCTJ

+5.8%

SPY

+14.8%

9 pts behind SPY

OCTJ over 1 year: paid 5.3%, price +0.3%, total +5.8%, SPY +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OCTJ

+5.8%

5.3% of it arrived as cash

9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9 pts behind SPY

OCTJ over 1 year: paid 5.3%, price +0.3%, total +5.8%, SPY +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OCTJ

+5.8%

9 pts behind SPY

5.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. OCTJ over 1 year: paid 5.3%, price +0.3%, total +5.8%, SPY +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.79% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; OCTJ is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JANH vs OCTJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	JANH	OCTJ
Paid and earned
Measure	JANH	OCTJ
Total return, 1 year	+6.5%	+5.8%
Price change, 1 year	rose 0.1%	rose 0.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	50% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment	36% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	JANH	OCTJ
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Against its benchmark, same days	behind by 8.3 pts	behind by 9.0 pts
Cost and size
Measure	JANH	OCTJ
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.79%
Net assets	$12m	$15m
Holdings
Measure	JANH	OCTJ
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OCTJ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score61.1JANH65OCTJ

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

JANH 61.1

OCTJ 65

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, JANH and OCTJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JANH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly OCTJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer Innovator Innovator

Strategy defined income defined income

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays quarterly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 6.2% 5.3%

Expense ratio 0.79% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 6.2% 5.3%

Price change, 1 year +0.1% +0.3%

Total return, 1 year +6.5% +5.8%

Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%

Ahead or behind −8.3 pts −9.0 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 50% 36%

Age 2.8 years 3.1 years

Net assets $12m $15m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JANH vs OCTJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	JANH	OCTJ	JANH	OCTJ	JANH	OCTJ
3 months	+1.3%	+1.0%	1.6%	1.3%	+1.4 pts	+1.2 pts
6 months	+3.3%	+2.4%	3.1%	2.6%	−1.7 pts	−2.7 pts
1 year	+6.5%	+5.8%	6.2%	5.3%	−8.3 pts	−9.0 pts
3 years	–	+18.1%	–	17.0%	–	−64.8 pts
Since launchNot the same days: JANH Jan 2024 · OCTJ Oct 2023	+20.6%	+19.6%	17.7%	17.2%	−47.0 pts	−66.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

JANH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 50% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OCTJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 36% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JANH or OCTJ?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting price in cash and OCTJ paid 5.3%, so JANH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or OCTJ?: With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and OCTJ +5.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JANH or OCTJ?: JANH and OCTJ both charge 0.79% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

JANH vs OCTH JANH vs NLSI JANH vs ACKY JANH vs SPIN OCTJ vs SPUT OCTJ vs SCLZ OCTJ vs QUSA OCTJ vs TPRY

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →JANH on its own →OCTJ on its own →JANH dividend history →OCTJ dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

JANH and OCTJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JANH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JANH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JANH ↗

OCTJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

OCTJ 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for OCTJ ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JANH against OCTJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-octj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.