Data as of .
JANH vs OCTJ: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year JANH paid 6.1% of its price in cash against OCTJ’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JANH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JANH and OCTJ hold 97% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | JANH | OCTJ |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 96.95% | 98.69% |
| Only in JANH | Only in OCTJ |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 1.53% | TREASURY BILL 1.31% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JANH | OCTJ | JANH | OCTJ | JANH | OCTJ | |
| 3 months | +1.6% | +1.1% | 1.6% | 1.3% | −0.6 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 6 months | +6.9% | +4.0% | 3.2% | 2.7% | −11.1 pts | −14.1 pts |
| 1 year | +6.5% | +5.5% | 6.1% | 5.2% | −10.1 pts | −11.1 pts |
| Since launch | +19.8% | +18.9% | 16.1% | 15.9% | −46.6 pts | −66.0 pts |
| JANH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | OCTJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | Innovator |
| Strategy | defined income | defined income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | quarterly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.2% | 5.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | 0.0% | +0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.5% | +5.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.1 pts | −11.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 990 days | 1082 days |
| Net assets | $14m | $15m |
JANH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANH paid 6.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly.
OCTJ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JANH or OCTJ?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANH paid 6.1% of its starting price in cash and OCTJ paid 5.2%, so JANH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or OCTJ?
- With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and OCTJ returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JANH returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JANH or OCTJ?
- JANH charges 0.79% a year and OCTJ charges 0.79%, so JANH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JANH against OCTJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-octj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.