Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IVVW vs OCTJ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year IVVW paid 17.5% of its price in cash against OCTJ’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October.

17.5%IVVW cash paid, 1 year
5.2%OCTJ cash paid, 1 year
+17.2%IVVW total return, 1 year
+5.5%OCTJ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: IVVW scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

IVVW 61.3OCTJ 42.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IVVW0.6 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% as cash0.6 pts ahead of SPY
OCTJ11.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%5.2% of it arrived as cash11.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%11.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVVW and OCTJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IVVWOnly in OCTJ
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 101.45%TREASURY BILL 98.69%
USD CASH 0.18%TREASURY BILL 1.31%
OCT26 SPX C @ 7625.000000 -1.63%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IVVW and OCTJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
IVVWOCTJIVVWOCTJIVVWOCTJ
3 months+4.6%+1.1%2.6%1.3%+2.4 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+13.1%+4.0%7.9%2.7%−4.9 pts−14.1 pts
1 year+17.2%+5.5%17.5%5.2%+0.6 pts−11.1 pts
Since launch+38.9%+18.9%39.7%15.9%−14.9 pts−66.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IVVW and OCTJ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
OCTJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssueriSharesInnovator
Strategycovered calldefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized7.6%5.3%
Expense ratio0.25%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year17.5%5.2%
Price change, 1 year−2.0%+0.1%
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+0.6 pts−11.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age917 days1082 days
Net assets$350m$15m

IVVW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.6%, paid monthly.

OCTJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IVVW or OCTJ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting price in cash and OCTJ paid 5.2%, so IVVW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IVVW or OCTJ?
With every distribution reinvested, IVVW returned +17.2% and OCTJ returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so IVVW returned more.
Which is cheaper, IVVW or OCTJ?
IVVW charges 0.25% a year and OCTJ charges 0.79%, so IVVW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVVW against OCTJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVVW against OCTJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ivvw-vs-octj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources