Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

HYTI vs TSYW: which paid, and which earned it?

HYTI and TSYW both write options for income.

FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF and Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF.

9.9%HYTI cash paid, 1 year
9.6%TSYW cash paid, 1 year
+3.2%HYTI total return, 1 year
−9.8%TSYW total return, 1 year
HYTI0.6 pts ahead of HYG · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
HYG+2.6%HYTI+3.2%9.9% as cash0.6 pts ahead of HYGTotal return, distributions reinvestedHYG+2.6%HYTI+3.2%0.6 pts ahead of HYG
TSYW4.2 pts behind TLT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−5.6%TSYW−9.8%4.2 pts behind TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−5.6%TSYW−9.8%4.2 pts behind TLT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HYTI and TSYW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in HYTIOnly in TSYW
2026-10-30 iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Co 98.16%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
US Dollar 0.73%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.60%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 09/29/2026 0.59%
2026-09-25 iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Co -0.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

HYTI and TSYW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
HYTITSYWHYTITSYWHYTITSYW
3 months−0.2%−7.1%2.5%2.8%+0.2 pts−1.9 pts
6 months+2.6%−5.7%5.1%6.1%+0.1 pts−2.5 pts
1 year+3.2%not published9.9%not published+0.6 ptsnot published
Since launch+8.8%−9.8%15.4%9.6%+0.7 pts−4.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
HYTI and TSYW on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HYTI
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
Option income on HYG, paying monthly
TSYW
Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on TLT, paying weekly
IssuerFirst TrustRoundhill
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkUS high yield bonds (HYG), used as the proxy20+ Year Treasury (TLT)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized10.4%12.4%
Expense ratio0.65%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year9.9%9.6% (since launch on Nov 13, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−6.8%−18.8%
Total return, 1 year+3.2%−9.8% (since launch on Nov 13, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+2.6%−5.6%
Ahead or behind+0.6 pts−4.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age582 days309 days
Net assets$94m$3m

HYTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, HYTI paid 9.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.2%. US high yield bonds (HYG), used as the proxy returned +2.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid monthly.

TSYW in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 13, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, TSYW paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −9.8%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −5.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, HYTI or TSYW?
HYTI charges 0.65% a year and TSYW charges 0.99%, so HYTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HYTI against TSYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYTI against TSYW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hyti-vs-tsyw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources