Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
HOOW vs HOYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HOYY paid 44.3% of its price in cash against HOOW’s 31.9%, though HOOW returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HOOW and HOYY
Net assets: $115m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF, and $7.7m on Nov 3, 2026 for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF.
11.4 pts behind HOOD
HOOW over 1 year: paid 31.9%, price −72.8%, total −47.5%, HOOD −36.1%, −11.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
HOOD
−36.1%
HOOW
−47.5%
11.4 pts behind HOOD
Total return, distributions reinvested
11.4 pts behind HOOD
HOOW over 1 year: paid 31.9%, price −72.8%, total −47.5%, HOOD −36.1%, −11.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
HOOD
−36.1%
HOOW
−47.5%
11.4 pts behind HOOD
31.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. HOOW over 1 year: paid 31.9%, price −72.8%, total −47.5%, HOOD −36.1%, −11.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.13.5 pts behind HOOD
HOYY over 1 year: paid 44.3%, price −81.7%, total −49.6%, HOOD −36.1%, −13.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
HOOD
−36.1%
HOYY
−49.6%
13.5 pts behind HOOD
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.5 pts behind HOOD
HOYY over 1 year: paid 44.3%, price −81.7%, total −49.6%, HOOD −36.1%, −13.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
HOOD
−36.1%
HOYY
−49.6%
13.5 pts behind HOOD
44.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. HOYY over 1 year: paid 44.3%, price −81.7%, total −49.6%, HOOD −36.1%, −13.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
HOOW costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; HOOW is 14.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | HOOW | HOYY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −47.5% | −49.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 72.8% | fell 81.7% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment | 98% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Robinhood (HOOD) | Robinhood (HOOD) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $112m | $7.7m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 77 income ETFs writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Oct 10, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 55 weekly returns · each against HOODFrom Oct 2025 to Oct 2026, HOYY returned slightly more: −49.0% to −50.7%. HOYY swung less: 26.8% to 86.8%. HOYY fell less at its worst: −51.2% to −63.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | HOOW | HOYY | HOOD | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | −50.7% | −49.0% | HOYY (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | −48.8% | −47.1% | HOYY (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | −76.2% | −82.9% | HOOW (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 86.8% | 26.8% | HOYY | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 52.8% | 24.9% | HOYY | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −63.2% | −51.2% | HOYY | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 212.9% | 3.0% | 100.0% | HOOW | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 101.5% | 86.2% | 100.0% | HOYY | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.20 | 0.29 | 1.00 | HOYY lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.61 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | −0.41 | −2.36 | HOOW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | −0.68 | −2.55 | HOOW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | −0.299 | −2.206 | −0.257 | HOOW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | −0.77 | −0.92 | HOOW | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | HOOD | HOOD | HOOD | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −5.0% a year | −56.0% a year | 0.0% | Both significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −2.36 | −3.38 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −9.2% to −0.7% | −89.2% to −22.8% | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | ||
| Information ratio | −0.69 | −0.69 | Tie | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 14.4% | 54.4% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 55 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, HOOW and HOYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | HOOW | HOYY | HOOW | HOYY | HOOW | HOYY |
| 3 months | −9.2% | −6.8% | 17.0% | 17.5% | −3.4 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +6.8% | −8.9% | 35.5% | 31.5% | −3.8 pts | −19.4 pts |
| 1 year | −47.5% | −49.6% | 31.9% | 44.3% | −11.4 pts | −13.5 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: HOOW Jun 2025 · HOYY Sep 2025 | −2.2% | −51.0% | 89.8% | 49.9% | −13.7 pts | −12.1 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
HOOW
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HOOW paid 31.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 72.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −47.5%. Robinhood (HOOD) returned −36.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 59.6%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
HOYY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HOYY paid 44.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 81.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −49.6%. Robinhood (HOOD) returned −36.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 78.2%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HOOW against HOYY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hoow-vs-hoyy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). HOOW against HOYY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hoow-vs-hoyy
[HOOW against HOYY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hoow-vs-hoyy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.