Data as of .
HEMI vs SIXH: which paid, and which earned it?
HEMI and SIXH both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HEMI and SIXH hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | HEMI | SIXH |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 9.11% | 2.67% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.13% | 1.49% |
| Apple Inc | 5.86% | 1.45% |
| Broadcom Inc | 4.02% | 1.35% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.66% | 1.30% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 5.73% | 1.29% |
| Merck & Co Inc | 1.15% | 1.37% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.15% | 2.37% |
| Walmart Inc | 1.70% | 1.11% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 1.02% | 1.30% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 0.87% | 2.37% |
| Wells Fargo & Co | 0.85% | 1.19% |
| Only in HEMI | Only in SIXH |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc 7.69% | Altria Group, Inc. 4.83% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.72% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3.77% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.42% | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 3.74% |
| Mastercard Inc 2.04% | AT&T INC. 3.59% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.89% | QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 3.53% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 1.71% | Pepsico, Inc. 3.44% |
| KLA Corp 1.39% | LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.11% |
| Netflix Inc 1.39% | COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY 2.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEMI | SIXH | HEMI | SIXH | HEMI | SIXH | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +4.5% | 2.2% | 0.5% | −1.5 pts | +2.2 pts |
| 6 months | +13.6% | +7.4% | 4.9% | 0.9% | −4.5 pts | −10.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +16.3% | not published | 2.0% | not published | −0.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +43.8% | not published | 6.6% | not published | −34.6 pts |
| Since launch | +11.2% | +96.3% | 6.0% | 16.0% | −3.4 pts | −88.5 pts |
| HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | SIXH ETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Hartford | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 0.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | 2.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.9% | +14.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | +16.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +14.7% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.4 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 275 days | 2321 days |
| Net assets | $33m | $543m |
HEMI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
SIXH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SIXH paid 2.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HEMI or SIXH?
- HEMI charges 0.49% a year and SIXH charges 0.69%, so HEMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HEMI against SIXH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hemi-vs-sixh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.