Data as of .
GRNI vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
GRNI and YMAG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GRNI and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GRNI | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.11% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| Quanta Services Inc 3.23% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% |
| GE Vernova Inc 3.08% | YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% |
| Strategy Inc 3.04% | YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% |
| Amazon.com Inc 2.99% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.96% | YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% |
| Broadcom Inc 2.90% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% |
| Arista Networks Inc 2.86% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRNI | YMAG | GRNI | YMAG | GRNI | YMAG | |
| 3 months | +2.1% | +6.1% | 2.5% | 9.4% | −0.2 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +16.3% | +15.4% | 5.4% | 21.1% | −1.8 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +14.5% | +70.7% | 7.8% | 89.1% | −2.1 pts | −34.1 pts |
| GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fundstrat | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.0% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 7.8% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +6.2% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 304 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $49m | $297m |
GRNI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GRNI paid 7.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.0%, paid monthly.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, GRNI or YMAG?
- GRNI charges 0.99% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so GRNI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNI against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/grni-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.