Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GRNI vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

GRNI and JULH both write options for income.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

7.8%GRNI cash paid, 1 year
4.7%JULH cash paid, 1 year
+14.5%GRNI total return, 1 year
+4.5%JULH total return, 1 year
GRNI2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%GRNI+14.5%7.8% of it arrived as cash2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%GRNI+14.5%2.1 pts behind SPY
JULH12.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%4.7% as cash12.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%12.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNI and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GRNIOnly in JULH
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.11%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
Quanta Services Inc 3.23%
GE Vernova Inc 3.08%
Strategy Inc 3.04%
Amazon.com Inc 2.99%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%
Broadcom Inc 2.90%
Arista Networks Inc 2.86%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GRNI and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GRNIJULHGRNIJULHGRNIJULH
3 months+2.1%+1.8%2.5%1.1%−0.2 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+16.3%+4.0%5.4%2.7%−1.8 pts−14.0 pts
1 yearnot published+4.5%not published4.7%not published−12.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+20.7%not published18.4%not published−57.7 pts
Since launch+14.5%+22.7%7.8%18.6%−2.1 pts−55.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GRNI and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNI
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerFundstratInnovator
Strategyoption incomedefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized10.0%4.2%
Expense ratio0.99%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year7.8% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025)4.7%
Price change, 1 year+6.2%−0.4%
Total return, 1 year+14.5% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025)+4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−12.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age304 days1173 days
Net assets$49m$17m

GRNI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GRNI paid 7.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.0%, paid monthly.

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GRNI or JULH?
GRNI charges 0.99% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNI against JULH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNI against JULH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/grni-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources