Data as of .
GPIX vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year GPIX paid 8.8% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIX scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GPIX | Only in JULH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.33% | TREASURY BILL 100.00% |
| APPLE INC 6.47% | |
| ALPHABET INC 4.37% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.90% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.39% | |
| BROADCOM INC 2.80% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02% | |
| TESLA INC 1.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIX | JULH | GPIX | JULH | GPIX | JULH | |
| 3 months | +2.6% | +1.8% | 2.1% | 1.1% | +0.3 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +16.6% | +4.0% | 4.7% | 2.7% | −1.4 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | +17.0% | +4.5% | 8.8% | 4.7% | +0.4 pts | −12.1 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +20.7% | not published | 18.4% | not published | −57.7 pts |
| Since launch | +80.7% | +22.7% | 30.5% | 18.6% | −10.8 pts | −55.9 pts |
| GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Innovator |
| Strategy | covered call | defined income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | quarterly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.6% | 4.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.8% | 4.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.4% | −0.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +4.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.4 pts | −12.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1058 days | 1173 days |
| Net assets | $5.8bn | $17m |
GPIX in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIX or JULH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.7%, so GPIX paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or JULH?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +17.0% and JULH returned +4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPIX returned more.
- Which is cheaper, GPIX or JULH?
- GPIX charges 0.29% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so GPIX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against JULH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpix-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.