Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GPIQ vs TPAY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
GPIQ and TPAY both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GPIQ and TPAY
Net assets: $6.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF, and $2.1m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF.
0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
GPIQ
+13.0%
10.9% of it arrived as cash
0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
GPIQ
+13.0%
10.9% as cash
0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
10.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1 pt behind VOO
TPAY since launch: paid 6.6%, price +4.6%, total +11.6%, VOO +12.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
VOO
+12.6%
TPAY
+11.6%
6.6% of it arrived as cash
1 pt behind VOO
Total return, distributions reinvested
1 pt behind VOO
TPAY since launch: paid 6.6%, price +4.6%, total +11.6%, VOO +12.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
VOO
+12.6%
TPAY
+11.6%
6.6% cash
1 pt behind VOO
6.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +13.0%. TPAY since launch: paid 6.6%, price +4.6%, total +11.6%, VOO +12.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Both charts share one scale, 0 to +13.0%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
GPIQ costs 0.20 points a year less; GPIQ is far larger, $6.4bn against $2.1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GPIQ | TPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.0% | not published |
| Price change | rose 1.7% (1 year) | rose 4.6% (since Feb 18, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 15, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 0.7 pts | behind by 1.0 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.49% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $6.4bn | $2.1m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and TPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GPIQ | TPAY | GPIQ | TPAY | GPIQ | TPAY |
| 3 months | −2.6% | −0.8% | 2.6% | 2.3% | +0.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +0.5% | +4.2% | 5.3% | 4.7% | +0.9 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 1 year | +13.0% | – | 10.9% | – | +0.7 pts | – |
| 3 years | +80.0% | – | 38.3% | – | −11.4 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: GPIQ Oct 2023 · TPAY Feb 2026 | +91.4% | +11.6% | 40.7% | 6.6% | −13.4 pts | −1.1 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
GPIQ
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.
TPAY
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 18, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, TPAY paid 6.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.6%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +12.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 15, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GPIQ against TPAY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-tpay
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GPIQ against TPAY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-tpay
[GPIQ against TPAY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-tpay)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.