Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GPIQ vs LJAN: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year GPIQ paid 11.0% of its price in cash against LJAN’s 4.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January.

11.0%GPIQ cash paid, 1 year
4.9%LJAN cash paid, 1 year
+21.4%GPIQ total return, 1 year
+5.1%LJAN total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

GPIQ 78.6LJAN 40.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GPIQAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%GPIQ+21.4%11.0% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%GPIQ+21.4%about even with QQQ
LJAN11.4 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LJAN+5.1%4.9% as cash11.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LJAN+5.1%11.4 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and LJAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GPIQOnly in LJAN
NVIDIA CORP 7.48%TREASURY BILL 97.22%
APPLE INC 6.59%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.20%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.96%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
ALPHABET INC 3.54%TREASURY BILL 0.40%
TESLA INC 3.17%TREASURY BILL 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPIQ and LJAN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPIQLJANGPIQLJANGPIQLJAN
3 months−1.7%+1.3%2.5%1.2%+0.8 pts−1.0 pts
6 months+20.5%+4.8%5.9%2.5%−3.7 pts−13.2 pts
1 year+21.4%+5.1%11.0%4.9%−0.4 pts−11.4 pts
Since launch+98.3%+16.1%38.2%13.9%−15.0 pts−50.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPIQ and LJAN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
LJAN
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerGoldman SachsInnovator
Strategycovered callbuffer with income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized10.5%4.8%
Expense ratio0.29%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year11.0%4.9%
Price change, 1 year+9.3%+0.1%
Total return, 1 year+21.4%+5.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−0.4 pts−11.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1058 days990 days
Net assets$5.8bn$12m

GPIQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.

LJAN in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJAN paid 4.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIQ or LJAN?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting price in cash and LJAN paid 4.9%, so GPIQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or LJAN?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +21.4% and LJAN returned +5.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or LJAN?
GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and LJAN charges 0.79%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPIQ against LJAN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against LJAN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-ljan Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources