Data as of .
GPIQ vs HEMI: which paid, and which earned it?
GPIQ and HEMI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and HEMI hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GPIQ | HEMI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.48% | 9.11% |
| APPLE INC | 6.59% | 5.86% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.20% | 5.73% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.96% | 5.72% |
| ALPHABET INC | 3.54% | 7.69% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.69% | 4.02% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 2.78% | 2.66% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 4.11% | 1.89% |
| WALMART INC | 2.12% | 1.70% |
| KLA CORP | 1.74% | 1.39% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.62% | 1.15% |
| LINDE PLC | 1.11% | 1.11% |
| Only in GPIQ | Only in HEMI |
|---|---|
| INTEL CORP 3.01% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.42% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.57% | Eli Lilly & Co 2.13% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC 2.51% | Mastercard Inc 2.04% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP 2.37% | Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 1.71% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 1.97% | Intercontinental Exchange Inc 1.28% |
| SANDISK CORP 1.48% | Welltower Inc 1.26% |
| PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 1.30% | AutoZone Inc 1.21% |
| MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 1.11% | Merck & Co Inc 1.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | HEMI | GPIQ | HEMI | GPIQ | HEMI | |
| 3 months | −1.7% | +0.8% | 2.5% | 2.2% | +0.8 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 6 months | +20.5% | +13.6% | 5.9% | 4.9% | −3.7 pts | −4.5 pts |
| 1 year | +21.4% | not published | 11.0% | not published | −0.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +98.3% | +11.2% | 38.2% | 6.0% | −15.0 pts | −3.4 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Hartford |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.5% | 9.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.49% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.0% | 6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.3% | +4.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.4% | +11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +14.7% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | −3.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1058 days | 275 days |
| Net assets | $5.8bn | $33m |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.
HEMI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, GPIQ or HEMI?
- GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and HEMI charges 0.49%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against HEMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-hemi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.